Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2806416.2806500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Modeling of User Check-in Behaviors for Point-of-Interest Recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenges regarding location recommendation have already been tackled through different traditional methods [72,76] [78,38,85,83]. CF methods have two categories; memory-based and model-based [8] and study a user's interest regarding each proposed POI.…”
Section: Location Recommendation Using Lbsn Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The challenges regarding location recommendation have already been tackled through different traditional methods [72,76] [78,38,85,83]. CF methods have two categories; memory-based and model-based [8] and study a user's interest regarding each proposed POI.…”
Section: Location Recommendation Using Lbsn Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a growing line of research has recently been dedicated to employing various kinds of effects to enhance recommender systems. Geographical [78,85,49], social [7,23], context-oriented [82,83] (e.g. text contents and word-of-mouth) and temporal influences are the commonly utilized factors [83].…”
Section: Location Recommendation Using Lbsn Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…JIM [82] is a joint probabilistic generative model which integrates the temporal effect, geographical-social influence, content effect and word-of-mouth effect. The word-of-mouth effect refers to that the probability of a user visiting a spatial item is largely affected by the popularity of this spatial item at the target region.…”
Section: Comparative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%