2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint modeling of genetically correlated diseases and functional annotations increases accuracy of polygenic risk prediction

Abstract: Accurate prediction of disease risk based on genetic factors is an important goal in human genetics research and precision medicine. Advanced prediction models will lead to more effective disease prevention and treatment strategies. Despite the identification of thousands of disease-associated genetic variants through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in the past decade, accuracy of genetic risk prediction remains moderate for most diseases, which is largely due to the challenges in both identifying all t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the predictive performance of polygenic risk score (PRS) models are relatively poor for most of complex diseases, PRS will be improved by increasing the sample size of the training GWAS data set and innovative statistical methods that incorporate additional biological information, e.g., functional annotation data and genetic pleiotropy (Chen, 2018;Hu, et al, 2017;Shi, et al, 2016). One difficulty for developing more accurate PRS is to evaluate the predictive LD-Pred (Vilhjalmsson, et al, 2015) and BLUP-type PRSs (Golan and Rosset, 2014;Speed and Balding, 2014) that are based on linear mixed models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the predictive performance of polygenic risk score (PRS) models are relatively poor for most of complex diseases, PRS will be improved by increasing the sample size of the training GWAS data set and innovative statistical methods that incorporate additional biological information, e.g., functional annotation data and genetic pleiotropy (Chen, 2018;Hu, et al, 2017;Shi, et al, 2016). One difficulty for developing more accurate PRS is to evaluate the predictive LD-Pred (Vilhjalmsson, et al, 2015) and BLUP-type PRSs (Golan and Rosset, 2014;Speed and Balding, 2014) that are based on linear mixed models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure S9: The enrichment results of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data in different communities. These results are for five communities generated by GeNets 79 . For each community, scRNAseq data were tested for genes from gTADA only.…”
Section: Simulation Of Data To Test the False Discovery Rates Of Top mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction accuracy of PRS remains moderate for most phenotypes. 13 Methods have been developed to improve PRS performance by explicitly modeling linkage disequilibrium (LD), 14 incorporating functional annotations and pleiotropy, 15,16 and improving effect estimates through statistical shrinkage. 17 Notably, most PRS models have tuning parameters, including the p-value threshold in traditional PRS, the penalty strength in penalized regression models, and the proportion of causal variants in LDpred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%