2004
DOI: 10.1198/016214504000001033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Modeling and Estimation for Recurrent Event Processes and Failure Time Data

Abstract: Recurrent event data are commonly encountered in longitudinal follow-up studies related to biomedical science, econometrics, reliability, and demography. In many studies, recurrent events serve as important measurements for evaluating disease progression, health deterioration, or insurance risk. When analyzing recurrent event data, an independent censoring condition is typically required for the construction of statistical methods. Nevertheless, in some situations, the terminating time for observing recurrent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
236
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
236
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has a variance of 0.10, which is close to independence. It is the same as one of the settings in the simulation study of Huang and Wang (2004). We increased the variance of the Poisson frailty on the suggestion of a reviewer, and obtained similar results with respect to bias (simulation not shown).…”
Section: Simulation Studysupporting
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This has a variance of 0.10, which is close to independence. It is the same as one of the settings in the simulation study of Huang and Wang (2004). We increased the variance of the Poisson frailty on the suggestion of a reviewer, and obtained similar results with respect to bias (simulation not shown).…”
Section: Simulation Studysupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The differences from our suggested model (MR model) and this non-parametric frailty approach (NPF model) proposed by Huang and Wang (2004) can be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations