2017
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4877(17)30035-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint measurability through Naimark’s dilation theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider the unital * -algebra A of differential operators acting on the function of the invariant space S , made of all finite complex linear combinations of finite compositions in arbitrary order of (i) the operator P := −i d dx representing the momentum algebraic observable for a particle confined in the box [0, 1], (ii) smoothed position algebraic observables represented by multiplicative operators f • induced by real-valued functions f ∈ S , and (iii) the constantly 1 function again acting multiplicatively and also defining the unit of the algebra. The involution is A * := A † ↾ S ( † being the adjoint in L 2 ([0, 1], dx) ⊃ S ) 2 The converse does not hold, since ker(πω) is a two-sided * -ideal and thus ker(πω) G (A,ω) in the general case.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consider the unital * -algebra A of differential operators acting on the function of the invariant space S , made of all finite complex linear combinations of finite compositions in arbitrary order of (i) the operator P := −i d dx representing the momentum algebraic observable for a particle confined in the box [0, 1], (ii) smoothed position algebraic observables represented by multiplicative operators f • induced by real-valued functions f ∈ S , and (iii) the constantly 1 function again acting multiplicatively and also defining the unit of the algebra. The involution is A * := A † ↾ S ( † being the adjoint in L 2 ([0, 1], dx) ⊃ S ) 2 The converse does not hold, since ker(πω) is a two-sided * -ideal and thus ker(πω) G (A,ω) in the general case.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, a n with associated joint measures on R n accounting for the expectation-value interpretation. The many-variables moment problem is not a straightforward generalization of the one-variable moment problem [21] and also the notion of joint POVM presents some non-trivial technical difficulties [2]. Already at the level of selfadjoint observables, commutativity of symmetric operators (say π ω (a 1 ) and π ω (a 2 )) on a dense invariant domain of essential selfadjointness (D ω ) does not imply the much more physically meaningful commutativity of their respective PVMs (as proved by Nelson [24]) and the existence of a joint PVM.…”
Section: Open Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that a POVM is a set of positive semi-definite observables that sum to the identity. The original result of Naimark is the scheme by which any POVM, or, generalized resolution of the identity, is realized as a set of commuting projectors on a larger space; see [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Shortly after the derivation by Naimark, an extension was presented by Sz.-Nagy [3] such that:…”
Section: Naimark's Theorem and The Sz-nagy Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons POVMs are often assigned the coveted status of most general type of quantum measurement possible, and are often a starting point for foundational discussions in quantum information theory. Background POVM details are given in [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and proofs of Naimark's result appear in [3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they are important for a range of quantum information processing protocols, where classical post-processing plays a role [30]. Another relevant application of commutative POVMs is the smearing of incompatible observables in order to get compatible observables (see [22,16]). All that explains the relevance of commutative POVMs both form the mathematical and the physical viewpoint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%