2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint loading and bone mineral density in persons with unilateral, trans-tibial amputation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
48
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
48
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…An age-matched control group (n = 9) was enrolled, as well. The proximal tibial, peak knee, internal abduction moment on the intact limb was 56 percent greater than on the prosthetic side knee, whereas in the control group's intact limb knee, it was 24 percent higher than in the prosthetic limb knee [45]. In contrast, when comparing prosthetic feet characteristics, Underwood et al reported only a 5 percent difference in internal abduction moment at the knee among people with transtibial amputation (n = 11) [46].…”
Section: Kneementioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An age-matched control group (n = 9) was enrolled, as well. The proximal tibial, peak knee, internal abduction moment on the intact limb was 56 percent greater than on the prosthetic side knee, whereas in the control group's intact limb knee, it was 24 percent higher than in the prosthetic limb knee [45]. In contrast, when comparing prosthetic feet characteristics, Underwood et al reported only a 5 percent difference in internal abduction moment at the knee among people with transtibial amputation (n = 11) [46].…”
Section: Kneementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Royer and Koenig also found that BMD at the proximal tibia was 45 percent larger in the contralateral limb knee than the prosthetic limb knee. They suggested that the contralateral knee experiences greater mechanical loading than the prosthetic limb, as reflected by the increased BMD, which may predispose people with transtibial amputation to premature joint degeneration, particularly knee osteoarthritis [45,47].…”
Section: Kneementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During swing, where ground reaction forces are not present, the reduced inertial properties of the prosthesis are more likely to influence estimates of resultant joint moments. Given that some researchers e.g., [26][27][28][29][30][31][32] utilize intact segment inertia properties to represent prosthesis inertial properties and otherse.g. [21][22][23] estimate prosthesis inertial properties directly, it is important to understand the impact of the methods chosen for estimating the inertial properties of the prosthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has looked at amputation jump takeoff characteristics [17][18][19] but no research has looked at the landing phase of the jump. Research on unilateral TTA walking and running gait has reported asymmetry where the intact limb experiences a greater loading than the prosthetic limb and/or ND persons [20][21][22]. People with amputation who are encouraged to participate in physical activity may therefore be compromised because of possible bilateral strength differences and their predisposition to OA at the intact knee and hip [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%