2015
DOI: 10.1190/geo2014-0313.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint inversion of seismic and electric data applied to 2D media

Abstract: Methods based on the seismic P-wave, seismic surface wave, and apparent resistivity are commonly used in the solution of several near-surface problems. However, the solution nonuniqueness and the intrinsic limitations of these methods can cause inconsistency in the final results. Dispersion curves of surface waves, P-wave traveltimes, and apparent-resistivity data were jointly inverted to obtain internally consistent and more reliable final model of P-and S-wave velocities and resistivity. A collection of 1D l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, joint inversion (Boiero and Socco, 2014) of different seismic data sets (such as SW and P-wave refraction data) would potentially provide a single, physically and spatially consistent seismic model. The inclusion of electrical resistivity measurements in the inversion scheme (Garofalo et al, 2015) would also likely be beneficial and would offer the possibility of linking a method inherently sensitive to temporal changes of moisture content (electrical resistivity tomography) to geophysical techniques more closely related to the mechanical behavior of the subsoil (seismic methods).…”
Section: Inverted S-wave Velocity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, joint inversion (Boiero and Socco, 2014) of different seismic data sets (such as SW and P-wave refraction data) would potentially provide a single, physically and spatially consistent seismic model. The inclusion of electrical resistivity measurements in the inversion scheme (Garofalo et al, 2015) would also likely be beneficial and would offer the possibility of linking a method inherently sensitive to temporal changes of moisture content (electrical resistivity tomography) to geophysical techniques more closely related to the mechanical behavior of the subsoil (seismic methods).…”
Section: Inverted S-wave Velocity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic and electrical methods have complementary sensitivities and are often combined in different ways (e.g., Zhang and Morgan, 1997;Gallardo and Meju, 2004;Garofalo et al, 2015;Ronczka et al, 2017). Carcione et al (2007) reviewed the cross-property relations between electrical conductivity and seismic velocity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Morgan (1997) can be counted among the first to develop joint inversion strategies for physically uncorrelated datasets (e.g., seismic velocities and electrical resistivities). Many modern joint inversion algorithms have been developed to improve the inversion results, reduce the uncertainties and incorporate a priori knowledge (e.g., Gallardo and Meju, 2004;Doetsch et al, 2010;Karaoulis et al, 2013;Garofalo et al, 2015;Linde and Doetsch, 2016;Hellman et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the deterministic realm, Paasche and Tronicke (2007), Li (2012, 2013) and LeliĂšvre et al (2012) use clustering approaches to constrain the values of inverted properties. Garofalo et al (2015) use a physical relationship and impose similar layer geometry during joint inversion. Another strategy has been introduced and used by Hoversten et al (2006), Gao et al (2012b), Giraud et al (2013), and Liang et al (2016) who use constitutive equations linking petrophysical properties to physical properties to retrieve petrophysical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%