2020
DOI: 10.1785/0120190203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Inversion of High-Frequency Receiver Functions and Surface-Wave Dispersion: Case Study in the Parnaíba Basin of Northeast Brazil

Abstract: We assess the performance of the joint inversion of receiver functions (RF) and surface-wave dispersion in the characterization of the sedimentary package comprising the Parnaíba basin. This procedure is routinely utilized in passive-source crustal studies to retrieve S-wave velocity variations with depth, and has seldom been used with higher-frequency datasets to investigate fine sedimentary structure. The Parnaíba basin is a Paleozoic cratonic basin composed of five supersequences, accumulating ∼3.5  km of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conduct P‐wave RF analysis of this event because the RF method is very sensitive to velocity discontinuities. On Earth, RFs have been routinely applied to study structures from near‐surface sedimentary layering (e.g., Cunningham & Lekic, 2020; Licciardi & Agostinetti, 2014; Victor et al., 2020) to the structure of the mantle transition zone (e.g., Xu et al., 2018). On Mars and the Moon, RFs mostly focus on the crustal scale so far (Durán et al., 2022; Knapmeyer‐Endrun et al., 2021; Vinnik et al., 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conduct P‐wave RF analysis of this event because the RF method is very sensitive to velocity discontinuities. On Earth, RFs have been routinely applied to study structures from near‐surface sedimentary layering (e.g., Cunningham & Lekic, 2020; Licciardi & Agostinetti, 2014; Victor et al., 2020) to the structure of the mantle transition zone (e.g., Xu et al., 2018). On Mars and the Moon, RFs mostly focus on the crustal scale so far (Durán et al., 2022; Knapmeyer‐Endrun et al., 2021; Vinnik et al., 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the Moho‐multiples are often not used in the joint inversion with RF waveforms (e.g., Shen & Ritzwoller, 2016; Shen, Ritzwoller, & Schulte‐Pelkum, 2013), leaving crustal Vp/Vs poorly constrained. Thus, crustal Vp/Vs can only be presumed during the inversion (e.g., Victor et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2020; Zhang & Yao, 2017) except for a few regional studies (e.g., Berg et al., 2021). Additionally, making inaccurate assumptions in crustal Vp/Vs while it trades off with other parameters results in insufficient constraints on all parameters of interest in the continent‐scale studies (Shen & Ritzwoller, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) The scattered waves in the scattering medium vary in different time windows, but it is unclear whether the PRFs are stable when calculated using different time windows. (c) The PRF method is widely used to study seismic structures of various scales on Earth (e.g., Victor et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2018;Zhu & Kanamori, 2000) and has also been successfully applied to Mars (Durán et al, 2022;Knapmeyer-Endrun et al, 2021;Lognonné et al, 2020;Shi et al, 2023a). However, for the Moon, only S-wave receiver functions beneath Apollo 12 (Lognonné et al, 2003;Vinnik et al, 2001) and no other RFs have been retrieved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%