IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004
DOI: 10.1109/vetecf.2004.1400463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint interleaver design for multiple turbo codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, we propose a new design with very small storage space to achieve the similar performance. This design with the original performance remained takes up 2 2 N as large as the storage space of the original design only, while the computing complexity is also 2 1 N that of the original algorithm.…”
Section: Pg 2260mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this, we propose a new design with very small storage space to achieve the similar performance. This design with the original performance remained takes up 2 2 N as large as the storage space of the original design only, while the computing complexity is also 2 1 N that of the original algorithm.…”
Section: Pg 2260mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The storage space of the new one is 2 2 N as large as that of the original one and the computing complexity decreases to 2 1 N of the original one. It can be illustrated that the modified algorithm improves in running time and storage space so largely to ignore the limitation of the permutor size for the original algorithm.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interleaver design in the context of multidimensional parallel concatenated convolutional codes is addressed in [12] and [13]. Here, the fact that data sequences which are divisible by the feedback polynom of the recursive convolutional constituent codes produce low weight code words is taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interleaver should permute those divisible patterns to non divisible patterns. In order not to put too many restrictions on one interleaver, the idea in [12], [13] is that each interleaver takes care of a subset of critical patterns which have to be broken. This ensures that at least one constituent code contributes weight to the codeword.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%