2010 7th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2010.5624541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint interference suppression and power allocation techniques for multiuser multiantenna relay broadcast systems

Abstract: In this work, we study the downlink of multiuser multiantenna systems which employ one multiple-input multipleoutput (MIMO) relay and the amplify-and-forward (AF) relay strategy. We propose joint constrained optimization frameworks that consider the allocation of power levels between the base station (BS) and the relay station (RS) subject to a total power constraint and the joint design of BS precoders, relay beamformers and mobile station (MS) receivers. In terms of the perfect channel state information (CSI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) BC (1S-1R-MD): The MMSE design for BC was considered in [19] with single-antenna users, and in [20], [23], [25], [27] with multi-antenna users. The latter case usually requires complex algorithms that iterate multiple times through the precoder, the relaying matrix and every equalizers.…”
Section: Further Comments On Typical Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) BC (1S-1R-MD): The MMSE design for BC was considered in [19] with single-antenna users, and in [20], [23], [25], [27] with multi-antenna users. The latter case usually requires complex algorithms that iterate multiple times through the precoder, the relaying matrix and every equalizers.…”
Section: Further Comments On Typical Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VII-A, different initial points almost lead to the same performance. Algorithm 2 is different from a conventional alternating approach widely used to solve similar problems [19], [20], [27], [50]. The latter needs to alternate between all three matrices B, F and Q.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These procedures are summarized in Algorithm 1. Algorithm 1 is different from a conventional iterative approach widely used to solve similar problems [6,7,16]. The latter needs to iterate through all three matrices B, F and Q: if F and Q are fixed, B is updated as the optimal precoder for the equivalent multipleinput multiple-output (MIMO) channel [15]; if B and Q are held constant, F is optimized according to (11); if B and F are preserved, each diagonal entry of Q is the optimal MMSE receiver for the scalar channel of the corresponding user.…”
Section: Joint Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the mobile users are not collocated and hence cannot jointly process their received signals. In general, the problems of transceiver design for relay-assisted BC fall into two categories: minimizing the weighted sum power of the base station (BS) and the relay subject to quality of service (QoS) constraints [4], or optimizing a selected performance criterion such as the sum rate or mean square error (MSE) subject to power constraints [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The maximum sum-rate design was studied in [5] with special structures, such as zero forcing (ZF), dirty paper coding (DPC) and QR transceiver, and in [8] using quadratic programming.…”
Section: Introduction and Relation To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation