Joint Effects of the DEM Resolution and the Computational Cell Size on the Routing Methods in Hydrological Modelling

Abstract

Natural disasters, including droughts and floods, have caused huge losses to mankind. Hydrological modelling is an indispensable tool for obtaining a better understanding of hydrological processes. The DEM-based routing methods, which are widely used in the distributed hydrological models, are sensitive to both the DEM resolution and the computational cell size. Too little work has been devoted to the joint effects of DEM resolution and computational cell size on the routing methods. This study aims to study the joint effects of those two factors on discharge simulation performance with two representative routing methods. The selected methods are the improved aggregated network-response function routing method (I-NRF) and the Liner-reservoir-routing method (LRR). Those two routing methods are combined with two runoff generation models to simulate the discharge. The discharge simulation performance is evaluated under the cross combination of four DEM resolutions (i.e., 90 m, 250 m, 500 m, and 1000 m) and fifty-six computational cell sizes (ranging from 5 arc-min to 60 arc-min). Eleven years of hydroclimatic data from the Jianxi basin (2000–2010) and the Shizhenjie basin (1983–1993) in China are used. The results show that the effects of the DEM resolution and the computational cell size are different on the I-NRF method and the LRR method. The computational cell size has nearly no influence on the performance of the I-NRF methods, while the DEM resolution does. On the contrary, the LRR discharge simulation performance decreases with oscillating values as the computational cell size increases, but is hardly affected by the DEM resolution. Furthermore, the joint effects of the DEM resolution and the computational cell size can be ignored for both routing methods. The results of this study will help to establish the appropriate DEM resolution, computational cell size, and routing method when researchers build hydrological models to predict future disasters.

Digital elevation model cell size effect on erosion‐deposition simulation using the unit stream power erosion and deposition model in the dry‐hot valley region of Southwest China

“…For example, Liu et al (2011) has concluded that DEM cell size significantly influenced the calculation of the L factor in a 0.88 km 2 watershed in the lowlands of northern Germany. Similarly, Li et al (2016) and Kruk et al (2020) have found that the S factor was more sensitive to changes in DEM cell size than the L factor, and the value of the LS factor decreased to 1/6-1/3 of its value when the DEM cell size increased from 30 m to 1000 m. These findings indicated that the DEM cell size can greatly affect the simulation accuracy of the USPED models by influencing the value of topographic factor (LS).…”

A new methodology for probabilistic flood displacement risk assessment: the case of Fiji and Vanuatu

“…As usual in hydrological modeling practice, the DEM was aggregated to a coarser spatial resolution (1 km) to drastically reduce the computational load of the simulations, while preserving a good level of detail in representing the main hydrological processes (see e.g., Aerts et al, 2022;Li et al, 2022 for discussion on result dependency on resolution in hydrologic models). For the inundation model, where a more detailed representation of the local morphology is required, the original DEM resolution (∼30 m) was maintained.…”

Effect of Dynamic PET Scaling with LAI and Aspect on the Spatial Performance of a Distributed Hydrologic Model

“…To succeed in this, one relies on model calibration [1]. There are many parameters that affect rainfall-runoff models [2,3]. More parameters can be used, and more accurate results can be obtained with increasing computer processing power.…”