2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2014.6854344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint DOA and multi-pitch estimation using block sparsity

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel method to estimate the fundamental frequencies and directions-of-arrival (DOA) of multi-pitch signals impinging on a sensor array. Formulating the estimation as a group sparse convex optimization problem, we use the alternating direction of multipliers method (ADMM) to estimate both temporal and spatial correlation of the array signal. By first jointly estimating both fundamental frequencies and time-of-arrivals (TOAs) for each sensor and sound source, we then form a non-linea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this case, the analysis holds for any kind of non-overlapping sub-division of the sub-vectors, not only into the two variables corresponding to the same complex variables. This insight was used in [59] to generalize the above results to the case of multiple measurements vectors (array) case.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, in this case, the analysis holds for any kind of non-overlapping sub-division of the sub-vectors, not only into the two variables corresponding to the same complex variables. This insight was used in [59] to generalize the above results to the case of multiple measurements vectors (array) case.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The simulation and estimation procedure is performed for two cases; one where the number of harmonics L k are set to [5,6] and one where L k are set to [10,11]. In the former case, we set L max = 10 and in the latter we set L max = 20, i.e.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(`), ±2 Hz from the true values for the six compared methods, for the case of [5,6] and [10,11] harmonics, respectively. As is clear from the figures, the proposed method performs as well, or better, than the PEBS-TV algorithm, although requiring fewer tuning parameters.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation