2021
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2020.3025446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Device Scheduling and Resource Allocation for Latency Constrained Wireless Federated Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
144
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the S-CSI has to be used to the wireless channels with fast fading, such as the application scenarios of Internet of Vehicles (IoV) networks. From (11), we firstly write the channel conditions with the given latency threshold γ th as…”
Section: B S-csi Based Ba Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the S-CSI has to be used to the wireless channels with fast fading, such as the application scenarios of Internet of Vehicles (IoV) networks. From (11), we firstly write the channel conditions with the given latency threshold γ th as…”
Section: B S-csi Based Ba Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In further, some other wireless techniques such as mobile edge computing can be incorporated into the FL networks to reduce the communication cost, in order to accelerate the convergence [7]- [10]. Recently, the effect of latency on the FL networks has been studied, where several bandwidth allocation schemes were proposed to enhance the system performance [11], [12]. However, the channel state information is seldom incorporated into the system design of FL networks in the existing works, which motivates the work in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under both protocols, they minimize the total energy consumption at all edge devices over a particular finite training duration subject to a given training accuracy, by jointly optimizing the transmission power and rates at the edge devices for uploading model parameters and their central processing unit frequencies for local update. In [32], the authors propose a joint device scheduling and resource allocation policy to maximize the model accuracy within a given total training time budget for latency constrained wireless FL. The work in [34] analyzes how to design dynamic FL in mobile edge networks that optimally chooses the number of selected clients and the number of local iterations in each training round to minimize the total cost while ensuring convergence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another line of works aims to minimize wall-clock time via resource-aware optimization-based approaches, such as CPU frequency allocation (e.g., [29]), and communication bandwidth allocation (e.g., [30], [31]), straggler-aware client scheduling (e.g., [20], [32]- [37]), parameters control (e.g., [36]- [39]), and task offloading (e.g., [40], [41]). While these papers provided some novel insights, their optimization approaches did not consider how client sampling affects the total wall-clock time and thus are orthogonal to our work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%