2023
DOI: 10.1080/08959285.2023.2208362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Decision-Making and Team Outcomes: Examining Cross-Lagged Relationships and the Roles of Psychological Safety and Participative Leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for employees to exhibit discretionary behaviors, they need a social and motivational climate under which they feel safe (Edmondson, 1999;Lee et al, 2018). This is because psychological safety fosters employees to be proactive, innovative, and learning and change-oriented (Kundi and Shahid, 2023;Lee et al, 2018).…”
Section: Source(s): Authors' Own Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for employees to exhibit discretionary behaviors, they need a social and motivational climate under which they feel safe (Edmondson, 1999;Lee et al, 2018). This is because psychological safety fosters employees to be proactive, innovative, and learning and change-oriented (Kundi and Shahid, 2023;Lee et al, 2018).…”
Section: Source(s): Authors' Own Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2018). This is because psychological safety fosters employees to be proactive, innovative, and learning and change-oriented (Kundi and Shahid, 2023; Lee et al. , 2018).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the highest number of arrows pointing to the HAW was seven (including control variables), resulting in a required sample size of 70. Kundi and Shahid (2023) adopted this same approach. To further evaluate the adequacy of our sample size, a post hoc power analysis was conducted (Cohen, 1988) in GPower software with a p-value of 0.05, seven predictors and effect size (f 2 ) of 3.18.…”
Section: Power Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%