2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3030097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Attention Mechanisms for Monocular Depth Estimation With Multi-Scale Convolutions and Adaptive Weight Adjustment

Abstract: Monocular depth estimation is a fundamental problem for various vision applications, and is therefore gaining increasing attention in the field of computer vision. Though a great improvement has been made thanks to the rapid progress of deep convolutional neural networks, depth estimation of the object at finer details remains an unsatisfactory issue, especially in complex scenes that has rich structure information. In this paper, we proposed a deep end-to-end learning framework with the combination of multi-s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The REL value is slightly greater than the value in Liu et al. (2020), and the reason is that partial pedestrian samples with occlusion cause the errors of detected bounding boxes. Our vision‐based model's advantage is to avoid relying on LiDAR and improve the model's generalization ability.…”
Section: Experiments Of 3doimcontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The REL value is slightly greater than the value in Liu et al. (2020), and the reason is that partial pedestrian samples with occlusion cause the errors of detected bounding boxes. Our vision‐based model's advantage is to avoid relying on LiDAR and improve the model's generalization ability.…”
Section: Experiments Of 3doimcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…On the KITTI dataset, the absolute relative difference (REL) and root mean squared error (RMSE) for our model are 0.120 and 2.865, respectively. Table 7 compares our method with other methods (J. Jiang et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020; Xue et al. 2020), and our method has the lowest RMSE value.…”
Section: Experiments Of 3doimmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The results of the experiments on the NYUv2 dataset are reported in Table 1, in which our method is compared with other depth recovery approaches [4,5,17,18,21,22,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. By analyzing Table 1, Lee et al [50] explored relative depth and achieved optimal values for metrics and δ < 1.253.…”
Section: Qualitative Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al [ 27 ] proposed an adaptive weight allocation method based on a Gaussian model for their proposed hybrid loss function. Liu et al [ 28 ] proposed an effective adaptive weight adjustment strategy to adjust each loss term’s weight during training. Lee et al [ 29 ] proposed a loss rebalancing algorithm to initialize and rebalance weights for loss terms adaptively during training.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several loss function terms are commonly combined to construct loss functions for predicting a better-quality depth. Various weight-setting methods for the loss function terms have been proposed to balance the training process [ 27 , 28 , 29 ], but how to enhance loss function effectiveness for fixed loss term combinations remains an open question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%