Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience &Amp; Energy 2022
DOI: 10.1190/image2022-3751223.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint 3D inversion of gravity and magnetic data using deep learning neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One can rigorously use actual forward solutions or approximated forward solutions. In this study, we take the latter approach, following Shahriari et al, (2020) and Noh et al (2021 and2022). Thus, we need to solve the following minimization problem:…”
Section: Physics-guided DL Inversion Using An Approximated Forward So...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can rigorously use actual forward solutions or approximated forward solutions. In this study, we take the latter approach, following Shahriari et al, (2020) and Noh et al (2021 and2022). Thus, we need to solve the following minimization problem:…”
Section: Physics-guided DL Inversion Using An Approximated Forward So...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the development and application of inversion techniques have progressed by invoking assumptions in 1.5-dimensional (1.5Dassuming a three-dimensional source and a one-dimensional resistivity structure) (Zhang et al 2004, Bakr et al 2017, Wang et al 2017, Deleersnyder et al 2021, Wang et al 2021, 2.5-dimensional (2.5D) (Tabarovsky & Rabinovich 1998, Thiel et al 2018, and more recently to three-dimensional (Abubakar et al 2006, Puzyrev et al 2018, Marchant et al 2019 spaces. With the recent widespread utilization of machine learning (ML) algorithms, inversion using ML-and in particular, deep learning (DL)-has become a valuable alternative to traditional geophysical inversion methods (Araya-Polo et al 2018, Colombo et al 2021, Wei et al 2022. In electromagnetic logging applications, Jin et al (2019) invert 1.5D LWD resistivity measurements with a deep neural network (DNN) and a rigorous forward model by invoking a loss function that combines both model-and data-misfit; Shahriari et al (2021) construct a DNN approximation of both forward and inverse problems; Hu et al (2020) combine a gradient-based and a ML inversion method to enhance the generalization of training conditions; Noh et al (2021) and Noh et al (2022) considers multiple DL inversion architectures designed for varying geological situations for a 2.5D inversion of possibly fractured rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…또 한, 비지도학습, 준지도학습, 전이학습과 같은 접근법으로 자료 부족 문제를 해결하기 위한 연구들도 수행되고 있고 (e.g., Alfarraj and AlRegib, 2019;Di et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2021a;Song et al, 2022) 료 간의 상호작용을 직접적으로 모델링하는 데 제한이 있 어 성능 저하의 가능성이 있다. 최근 물리탐사 분야 딥러닝 기반 복합역산 관련 연구의 대부분이 규격화된 자료를 통합하여 사용하는 초기 통합 방식을 따른다(e.g., Wei et al., 2022a;Jiao et al, 2023)…”
unclassified