1982
DOI: 10.1145/319758.319768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joined normal form

Abstract: A new on-line query language and storage structure for a database machine is presented. By including a mathematical model in the interpreter the query language has been substantially simplified so that no reference to relation names is necessary. By storing the model as a single joined normal form (JNF) file, it has been possible to exploit the powerful search capability of the Content Addressable File Store (CAFS®; CAFS is a registered trademark of International Computers Limited) database machine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our notion of equivalence makes abstraction of which relations are actually stored, and we assume this information is not visible to the user. The user interface is instead a universal relation scheme (as in [2,13,19,21]), and QR is interpreted as the projection of this scheme on R. If we were willing to accept the pure universal relation assumption, then Qs could be obtained by simply projecting the appropriate universal relation on R. Instead, under the weak instance model, we are representing a set of possible universal relations rather than a single one. Conceptually, a correct answer to QR is then the result of projecting on R each one of the infinitely many weak instances for the state and then intersecting all such projections.…”
Section: Query-equivalent Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our notion of equivalence makes abstraction of which relations are actually stored, and we assume this information is not visible to the user. The user interface is instead a universal relation scheme (as in [2,13,19,21]), and QR is interpreted as the projection of this scheme on R. If we were willing to accept the pure universal relation assumption, then Qs could be obtained by simply projecting the appropriate universal relation on R. Instead, under the weak instance model, we are representing a set of possible universal relations rather than a single one. Conceptually, a correct answer to QR is then the result of projecting on R each one of the infinitely many weak instances for the state and then intersecting all such projections.…”
Section: Query-equivalent Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process, called Joined Normal Form [7], is to create a relation by joining all the relations through common attributes along the implication arcs. The n-tuples that are lost owing to the absence of common values in shared attributes can be restored by joining them to dummy n-tuples with undefined values in the nonspecified attributes.…”
Section: Representsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implication network of P, S, and PS. AP ps\s of each record is a bit vector storing the tags mentioned in [7]. This vector indicates the relations combined within the records as projections.…”
Section: Representsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations