2015
DOI: 10.1017/cls.2014.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Johns” in the Spotlight: Anti-prostitution Efforts and the Surveillance of Clients

Abstract: Th is essay examines surveillant practices that subject sex trade clients ("clients") to socio-legal control. In particular, I employ the concepts of the gaze, voyeurism, and exhibitionism to unpack the surveillant dynamics, and consider how power and pleasure are harnessed, produced, and thwarted in the increasing scrutiny of the sex trade's demand side. I further examine my own research of the regulation of clients within this analytical framework. Following David Lyon's insights on the scopophilic dimension… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although clients have been understudied relative to sex workers, research and publications have nonetheless provided an interesting “window into the world of men who pay for sex—a window which has only ever partially been opened” (Earle and Sharpe 2008, 77; also see Atchison 2010; Benoit and Shumka 2015; Lowman and Atchison 2006; Milrod and Weitzer 2012; Sanders 2008; Weitzer 2009). Much of the small but growing body of scholarship has focused on client socio-demographics and/or clients’ motivations for purchasing sexual services, finding that they tend to reflect the population as a whole and have diverse and varied reasons for seeing sex workers (Khan 2015; Monto and Milrod 2014; Pettinger 2011; Soothill and Sanders 2005; Wortley, Fischer and Webster 2002). Research that engaged over 250 clients in Canada, for example, found that the majority seek services that include companionship and conversation (Benoit et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although clients have been understudied relative to sex workers, research and publications have nonetheless provided an interesting “window into the world of men who pay for sex—a window which has only ever partially been opened” (Earle and Sharpe 2008, 77; also see Atchison 2010; Benoit and Shumka 2015; Lowman and Atchison 2006; Milrod and Weitzer 2012; Sanders 2008; Weitzer 2009). Much of the small but growing body of scholarship has focused on client socio-demographics and/or clients’ motivations for purchasing sexual services, finding that they tend to reflect the population as a whole and have diverse and varied reasons for seeing sex workers (Khan 2015; Monto and Milrod 2014; Pettinger 2011; Soothill and Sanders 2005; Wortley, Fischer and Webster 2002). Research that engaged over 250 clients in Canada, for example, found that the majority seek services that include companionship and conversation (Benoit et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, police practices have conjoined anti-sex work enforcement activities with anti-trafficking ones. For instance, police officers coordinate “john sweeps,” arresting those who attempt to purchase sexual services (Khan 2015, 2018), while also engaging in inappropriately named “raid and rescue” operations promoted as efforts to “save” trafficking victims and target their clients (Butterfly 2018; Fudge et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Men who buy sex have been the focus of research in a number of areas, such as sociology, social work, psychology and criminology (Khan, 2015;Kong, 2016;Kuosmanen, 2011;Munro and Della Giusta, 2016;Sandell et al, 1996;Sanders, 2008;Scaramuzzino, 2014). International research on the purchase of sex has interpreted the phenomenon as an expression of pathology and sexual defects (Ellis, 1959;Gibbens and Silberman, 1960), as an expression of masculinity or gender-based oppression (Farley, 2017;Joseph and Black, 2012;O'Connell Davidson, 1998), or as an expression of the commercialization of sexuality (Altman, 2001;Prasad, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%