1985
DOI: 10.1017/s0143814x00003068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

John W. Kingdon, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston: Little, Brown, 1984, xi + 240 pp., $9.95.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
1,314
1
148

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 782 publications
(1,476 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
1,314
1
148
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, I define a ''policy priority'' as a specific health issue that is receiving attention or consideration on the policy agenda [19]. An issue is considered to have obtained policy attention if policymakers (or those closely associated with them) explicitly decide to address an issue or not.…”
Section: Methodsological Issues: Defining and Measuring Policy Prioritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, I define a ''policy priority'' as a specific health issue that is receiving attention or consideration on the policy agenda [19]. An issue is considered to have obtained policy attention if policymakers (or those closely associated with them) explicitly decide to address an issue or not.…”
Section: Methodsological Issues: Defining and Measuring Policy Prioritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crises as decision arenas have been well documented in the literature . Dror (1993, p. 13) recognizes opportunities crises present due to 'the softening of institutional rigidities, which consequently open up new vistas for political and social feasibility', in other words, Kingdon's window of opportunity that becomes a propitious time for policy change (Kingdon, 1984). Lindh and Edler, the public official instrumental to the creation of the Coordination Group acted as policy and bureaucratic entrepreneurs respectively because of the following strategies:…”
Section: Policy Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e Central notions in our network approach, in addition to stakes, interests, knowledge, recourses and power, will be 'problem definitions' and 'agendas'.' 17,18,19 'Problem definition' refers to the different actor perceptions or interpretations of what is the central issue in the network. In our case, the various actors, for example, interpret the risks of GSBRs differently.…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%