Interstices 2003
DOI: 10.3138/9781442676268-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

John of Glastonbury and Borrowings from the Vernacular

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We see no reason to carve out a pure, pathology‐free “autism” when we can find nothing in the diagnostic literature describing it. Further, while we appreciate the intention of reducing stigma, the list of terms suggested to be eliminated has unfortunately already been weaponized against scientists and against family members who do not consider autism a simple “difference.” The list of restricted terms has been used to insult, bully and demean those who use the terms (Alice, 2022; Blaber, 2022; Carley, 2022; Donnelly, 2022; Lutz, 2021; Michael, 2022; Natri, 2022; Shakes & Cashin, 2020; Witch, 2022). Ironically, the intention to narrow permissible language to promote inclusivity is having the opposite effect, and the community is becoming more polarized.…”
Section: Consequences Of Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We see no reason to carve out a pure, pathology‐free “autism” when we can find nothing in the diagnostic literature describing it. Further, while we appreciate the intention of reducing stigma, the list of terms suggested to be eliminated has unfortunately already been weaponized against scientists and against family members who do not consider autism a simple “difference.” The list of restricted terms has been used to insult, bully and demean those who use the terms (Alice, 2022; Blaber, 2022; Carley, 2022; Donnelly, 2022; Lutz, 2021; Michael, 2022; Natri, 2022; Shakes & Cashin, 2020; Witch, 2022). Ironically, the intention to narrow permissible language to promote inclusivity is having the opposite effect, and the community is becoming more polarized.…”
Section: Consequences Of Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%