John Locke: Justice and the Social Compact

Gardner, Eric

doi:10.2307/1051205

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 11 publications

(3 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BC) approached the notion of justice from the perspective of the sense of fairness in distributions and settlements (Cordero, 1988). In the 17th century, John Locke, an English philosopher and physician, revisited this concept to form a foundation for the development of a moral theory while accounting for the interests of both the individual and the communal (Gardner, 1992). An exponentially growing interest in the concept of justice in the philosophy, sociology and management domains occurred after Rawls (1971) published a seminal book titled Theory of Justice in an attempt to reconcile the principles of liberty and equality.…”

Section: Antecedents Of Knowledge Sabotagementioning

confidence: 99%

Antecedents and consequences of knowledge sabotage in the Turkish telecommunication and retail sectors

Serenko

Abubakar²

2022

JKM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to propose and test a model explicating the antecedents and consequences of knowledge sabotage. Design/methodology/approach Data obtained from 330 employees working in the Turkish retail and telecommunication sectors were analyzed by means of the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling technique. Findings Co-worker knowledge sabotage is the key factor driving knowledge sabotage behavior of individual employees, followed by co-worker incivility. Interactional justice suppresses individual knowledge sabotage, while supervisor incivility does not affect it. Co-worker knowledge sabotage reduces job satisfaction of other employees, which, in turn, triggers their voluntary turnover intention. Contrary to a popular belief that perpetrators generally benefit from their organizational misbehavior, the findings indicate that knowledge saboteurs suffer from the consequences of their action because they find it mentally difficult to stay in their current organization. Employees understate their own knowledge sabotage engagement and/or overstate that of others. Practical implications Managers should realize that interactional justice is an important mechanism that can thwart knowledge sabotage behavior, promote a civil organizational culture, develop proactive approaches to reduce co-worker incivility and strive towards a zero rate of knowledge sabotage incidents in their organizations. Co-worker incivility and co-worker knowledge sabotage in the workplace are possible inhibitors of intraorganizational knowledge flows and are starting points for job dissatisfaction, which may increase workers’ turnover intention. Originality/value This study is among the first to further our knowledge on the cognitive mechanisms linking interactional justice and uncivil organizational behavior with knowledge sabotage and employee outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Antecedents Of Knowledge Sabotagementioning

confidence: 99%

Antecedents and consequences of knowledge sabotage in the Turkish telecommunication and retail sectors

Serenko

Abubakar²

2022

JKM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Oftentimes, victims are not even consulted, or the process itself is insulting. 26 For this reason, scholars of Holocaust studies have given great attention to the importance of the process of memorialization, especially following James Young's (1991, 30;1992;1993;2002) studies of counter-memorial practices in Germany. Young (2002, 65-80) famously describes how debates over memorialization were in themselves more effective commemorative acts "than any single 'final solution' to Germany's memorial problem."…”

Section: Measuring Up 129mentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 19. See Gardner 1992, 347, 362 (Rousseau noted that “no government was legitimate in which the general will of all people does not control the effective lawmaking power”); Rousseau and Cranston 2004, 29–30. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Up: A Dialogical Model for Assuring a Reparative Process

Laplante,

Reyes

2023

Law Soc. Inq.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International law obliges governments to assure adequate and effective reparations for human rights violations. To date, most evaluations of such programs focus on outcomes while overlooking the process of how the state engaged victims, or not, in the determination of what they needed to feel repaired. A consensus now points toward the need to better involve beneficiaries in reparations programs in the process of determining these outcomes, yet there remains a need to better understand how to assure meaningful and effective participation. In response, the authors present an expansive view of the right to participation that would oblige governments to assure the quality of this participation in all stages of reparation programming, including design, implementation, and evaluation. They argue that reparative processes are, in themselves, forms of reparation, which go toward citizen restitution. They offer preliminary guidelines on how to assure reparative processes, as well as their evaluation, through a dialogical model that helps reorient the view of “victims” to being active agents in determining not only appropriate reparations but also larger transformations. Reparative processes shift the focus of evaluation to look beyond outcomes and toward the quality of the design and implementation processes, which, if flawed, may ultimately undermine the overall impact of any reparation program.

show abstract

“…Tokoh yang cukup terkenal dengan gagasan Liberal adalah John Locke dan John Stuart Mill. Locke (dalam Tuckness, 1999;Gardner, 1993;Forde, 2009) memandang semua individu dianugerahi oleh Tuhan oleh akal atau yang disebutnya dengan Suara Tuhan (The Voice of God). Berkah ini yang kemudian menurut Locke (dalam Kivisto & Faist, 2007) memungkinkan manusia untuk berpikir dan bertindak sesuai dengan hukum alam.…”

Section: Pendekatan Liberalunclassified

Pendekatan Kewarganegaraan Indonesia

Manik

Samsuri

2021

Jurnal Citizsh. Virtues

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dalam diskursus kontemporer, aliran pendekatan kewarganegaraan terdiri atas Liberal, Republikan, dan Komunitarian. Tujuan dari kajian ini ialah untuk mengkaji dan menjelaskan pendekatan kewarganegaraan yang digunakan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data studi pustaka (library research). Sumber-sumber dalam penelitian ini ialah seperti buku, artikel hasil penelitian, dan dokumen-dokumen seperti UUD, Peraturan Pemerintah, dan Panduan-Panduan yang berkaitan dengan Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan. Data diolah dan dianalisis secara indukatif. Hasil dari temuan kajian ini ialah Pendekatan Kewarganegaraan Indonesia berbeda dengan pendekatan kewarganegaraan kontemporer. Pendekatan Kewarganegaraan Indonesia ialah pendekatan Pancasila yang merupakan sintesa dari ketiga aliran kontemporer. Ruang-ruang individu dan publik dilindungi dan dikembangkan oleh negara. Lebih dari itu, budaya masyarakat atau kearifan yang turut membentuk kehidupan masyarakat dilindungi dan dikembangkan oleh negara sebagaimana termaktub dalam UUDNRI Tahun 1945

show abstract

John Locke: Justice and the Social Compact

Cited by 4 publications

References 11 publications

Antecedents and consequences of knowledge sabotage in the Turkish telecommunication and retail sectors

Antecedents and consequences of knowledge sabotage in the Turkish telecommunication and retail sectors

Measuring Up: A Dialogical Model for Assuring a Reparative Process

Pendekatan Kewarganegaraan Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About