2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0362-3319(01)00113-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

John Dewey’s social psychology and neopragmatism: theoretical foundations of human agency and social reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dewey's rejection of a fixed self is in line with more recent postmodern deconstructions of the self (Musolf, 2001). According to Dewey, the self is a changeable social construction without stability, but with a "relative fluidity and diversity in the constituents of selfhood" (Dewey, 1922(Dewey, /1930.…”
Section: Thinkingsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dewey's rejection of a fixed self is in line with more recent postmodern deconstructions of the self (Musolf, 2001). According to Dewey, the self is a changeable social construction without stability, but with a "relative fluidity and diversity in the constituents of selfhood" (Dewey, 1922(Dewey, /1930.…”
Section: Thinkingsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Unlike his ideas about education and philosophy, which have continued to capture the minds of educators and neo-pragmatist philosophers, John Dewey's psychological ideas have been largely neglected (for notable exceptions, see Bredo, 1998Bredo, , 2003Manicas, 2002;Musolf, 2001). On the one hand, this is strange, since there is a rich and elaborated psychology in Dewey's works, which can be traced all the way back to his earliest years as a writer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This educational reform movement sided heavily on the side of "nurture," as opposed to the heavy reliance on "nature" by eugenics. Musolf (2003) asserted that educational progressives opposed the view taken by eugenics that whole sectors of the population could not benefit from formal education.…”
Section: The Role Of Public Schools In Societal Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This educational reform movement sided heavily on the side of "nurture" as opposed to the heavy reliance on "nature" by eugenics. Musolf (2003) asserted that educational progressives opposed the view taken by eugenics that whole sectors of the population could not benefit from formal education. They dismissed biological determinism in favor of self-determination, believing that education was transformative.…”
Section: Government Involvement In Social Issues the Increase In Govmentioning
confidence: 99%