In his study of the condemnation of 1277 R. Hissette has drawn attention to the connection between four articles within the list of condemned propositions and the discussions in the Artes-faculty, leading up to the condemnation of 1277, regarding accidents 'sine subiecto'. The articles in question are the following:-Quod, cum Deus non compareretur ad entia in ratione causae materialis vel formalis, non facit accidens esse sine subiecto, de cuius ratione est, actu inesse subiecto. (138/199) 1 -Quod accidens esse sine subiecto non est accidens, nisi aequivoce; et quod impossibile est quantitatem sive dimensiones esse per se; hoc enim esset ipsam esse substantiam. (139/198) -Quod facere accidens sine subiecto habet rationem impossibilis implicantis contradictionem. (140/196) -Quod Deus non potest facere accidens esse sine subiecto, nec plures dimensiones simul esse. (141/197) 5.1.1 The Parisian Condemnation of 1277 On 7 March 1277, the third anniversary of the death of St. Thomas Aquinas, Stephen Tempier, bishop of Paris, issued the condemnation of 219 errors of a theological and philosophical nature. 2 The challenge of integrating various non-Christian writings, 261 1 The first enumeration is taken from the original list as published in the Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis, ed. Heinrich S.