2018
DOI: 10.1093/ahr/123.3.1054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Johan Mathew. Margins of the Market: Trafficking and Capitalism across the Arabian Sea.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once again, eminently geographical phenomena such as the impossibility of permanently populating the high seas, or the challenges associated to accessing and controlling unruly coastlines, have produced distinctive legal norms like ‘the freedom of the seas’ and unique practices of shared or devolved jurisdiction at, or close to the sea, which Lauren Benton (2010) has labelled ‘legal pluralism’ (see also Merry, 1988; Colás & Mabee, 2010; Mathew, 2016; Pal, 2021). As commercial capitalism engulfed regional economies across the world, latching on to ancestral seaborne trade routes, repurposing local maritime knowledge and technologies (Sheriff, 2010), or adopting and adapting existing forms of property rights or labour exploitation at different ports (Bishara, 2017), the nature of the world market was also modified.…”
Section: Deep Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once again, eminently geographical phenomena such as the impossibility of permanently populating the high seas, or the challenges associated to accessing and controlling unruly coastlines, have produced distinctive legal norms like ‘the freedom of the seas’ and unique practices of shared or devolved jurisdiction at, or close to the sea, which Lauren Benton (2010) has labelled ‘legal pluralism’ (see also Merry, 1988; Colás & Mabee, 2010; Mathew, 2016; Pal, 2021). As commercial capitalism engulfed regional economies across the world, latching on to ancestral seaborne trade routes, repurposing local maritime knowledge and technologies (Sheriff, 2010), or adopting and adapting existing forms of property rights or labour exploitation at different ports (Bishara, 2017), the nature of the world market was also modified.…”
Section: Deep Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, mobility has always produced debts for those who go, and profits for those who facilitate their movement (Mathew 2016; Schouten 2022). It is not necessarily that people migrate more than they used to, or that farmers take on more debts than they used to (Agarwal 2021; Federici 2012; Gerber 2014; Graeber 2011; Shah and Lerche 2020).…”
Section: Debt and Risk In Mobility: Theoretical Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%