Abstract:Background and Purpose: Recently, job satisfaction has become a center of attention among academics, behavioral scientists, and business practitioners. Drawing on the tenet of the social exchange theory (SET) perspective and extending the conceptualization of the same, the present study aims at investigating the relationships among job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and citizenship behavior and mediation mechanism to unearth the effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on citizenship … Show more
“…This finding demonstrates the existence of the discriminant validity of the scales. Moreover, from table 1, it is found that the factor loading is more than 0.70 for each construct that also confirms the discriminant validity of the scales (Haque et al 2019;Kline 2005).…”
Section: Measurement Modelsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Committed and proactive employees can ensure the competitiveness of the organizations (Yen and Teng 2013). The development of favorable working environments is essential for creating committed teams and their performance (Haque, et al 2019). SL has a positive influence on both organizational commitment (OC) (Bobbio, Dierendonck, and Manganelli 2012;Van Dierendonck and Nuijten 2011;Zhou and Miao 2014) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) (Abid, Gulzar, and Hussain 2015;Bobbio et al 2012;Yang and Min 2013).…”
The main aim of the study to find out whether organizational commitment has any mediation effect on the relationship between servant leadership and organizational citizenship behavior. Data was collected from 432 managers and staff of private commercial banks in Bangladesh. The respondents were selected using the convenience sampling technique. Structural equation modeling was used for analyzing the collected data. The study reveals that servant leadership has a direct influence on organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior, as well as organizational commitment has a direct impact on organizational citizenship behavior. It is also revealed that the relationship between servant leadership and organizational commitment is partially mediated by organizational commitment. The main implication of the study is that employees’ organizational citizenship behavior can be improved by servant leadership of managers through the indirect effect of organizational commitment of employees. The study also pinpoints some limitations as well as future research directions.
“…This finding demonstrates the existence of the discriminant validity of the scales. Moreover, from table 1, it is found that the factor loading is more than 0.70 for each construct that also confirms the discriminant validity of the scales (Haque et al 2019;Kline 2005).…”
Section: Measurement Modelsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Committed and proactive employees can ensure the competitiveness of the organizations (Yen and Teng 2013). The development of favorable working environments is essential for creating committed teams and their performance (Haque, et al 2019). SL has a positive influence on both organizational commitment (OC) (Bobbio, Dierendonck, and Manganelli 2012;Van Dierendonck and Nuijten 2011;Zhou and Miao 2014) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) (Abid, Gulzar, and Hussain 2015;Bobbio et al 2012;Yang and Min 2013).…”
The main aim of the study to find out whether organizational commitment has any mediation effect on the relationship between servant leadership and organizational citizenship behavior. Data was collected from 432 managers and staff of private commercial banks in Bangladesh. The respondents were selected using the convenience sampling technique. Structural equation modeling was used for analyzing the collected data. The study reveals that servant leadership has a direct influence on organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior, as well as organizational commitment has a direct impact on organizational citizenship behavior. It is also revealed that the relationship between servant leadership and organizational commitment is partially mediated by organizational commitment. The main implication of the study is that employees’ organizational citizenship behavior can be improved by servant leadership of managers through the indirect effect of organizational commitment of employees. The study also pinpoints some limitations as well as future research directions.
“…Job satisfaction is an indicator in producing maximum work behavior (Ni et al, 2020;Tafzal Haque et al, 2019). It comes from what an organization has given its members.…”
Section: The Effect Of Job Satisfaction On Organizational Citizenship Behaviormentioning
This study analyzes the successful implementation of Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) through the roles of job satisfaction, organizational culture, and organizational commitment. The research was conducted at the Indonesian Electrical Contractors Associations using the Partial Least Square (PLS) method. A number of 100 respondents were asked to fill in a questionnaire distributed via a google form. The results explain that both organizational commitment and organizational culture affect positive behavior (OCB) while job satisfaction does not. These three variables have implications for behavior change represented by culture, job satisfaction, and commitment. Thus, it is possible to deduce that the success of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) is influenced by organizational commitment and culture that shape employee professionalism. As for job satisfaction, it must be improved through a competitive salary system, support among employees, and a conducive work environment.
“…The specific fit indexes included χ 2 = 607.70, df = 203, χ 2 / df = 2.994 < 3.00, RMSEA = 0.074 < 0.800, CFI = 0.920 > 0.900, TLI = 0.909 > 0.900, and SRMR = 0.068 < 0.800 (Fan et al, 2019; Ucar et al, 2021). Then, we used Composite Reliability (CR) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) to further test the measurement model (Haque et al, 2019; Jyoti & Bhau, 2015). The results showed that the CR values for four constructs were respectively 0.949, 0.889, 0.895, 0.956, which all exceeded the required threshold values of 0.70, and the AVE values for four constructs were respectively 0.861, 0.619, 0.588, 0.687, all exceeding the required threshold values of 0.50, too.…”
Performance appraisal, as a powerful tool for human resource management, has become an important driving force for organizations to achieve sustainability. However, only when employees believe that a performance appraisal is fair can an organization’s performance appraisal truly work and have a positive impact on employees. Hence, based on social exchange theory and social identity theory, we theorized and validated a dual path model to explore the influence of performance appraisal justice on employee job performance through work engagement and organizational identification. Survey data from 404 Chinese employees and their direct supervisors in high-tech enterprises were analyzed using multiple regression and structural equation modeling. Results indicate that performance appraisal justice of employees has a positive impact on their work engagement, organizational identification, and job performance. In addition, both work engagement and organizational identification of employees partly mediated the relationship between performance appraisal justice and their job performance. Our conclusions mean that when employees perceive justice in organizational performance appraisals, they will actively engage in their daily work and truly identify with their organizations, thus improving job performance, which is conducive to the sustainable development of organizations. The limitations and implications for future research and practice are also discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.