2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2016.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job placement advisor based on turnaround predictions for HPC hybrid clouds

Abstract: Abstract-Several companies and research institutes are moving their CPU-intensive applications to hybrid High Performance Computing (HPC) cloud environments. Such a shift depends on the creation of software systems that help users decide where a job should be placed considering execution time and queue wait time to access on-premise clusters. Relying blindly on turnaround prediction techniques will affect negatively response times inside HPC cloud environments. This paper introduces a tool to make job placemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is used in production in the XSEDE grid to predict queue waiting time. We have implemented this method ourselves for hybrid cloud environments with reasonably good results for both running time and queue waiting time [8]. However, as one can see from Tables IV and V other methods outperformed this form of kNN in several segments.…”
Section: B Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This method is used in production in the XSEDE grid to predict queue waiting time. We have implemented this method ourselves for hybrid cloud environments with reasonably good results for both running time and queue waiting time [8]. However, as one can see from Tables IV and V other methods outperformed this form of kNN in several segments.…”
Section: B Analysismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Site selection was intensively studied in grid computing, motivated by the availability of various clusters for a given job [46]. Another application area are systems that chose the best from a set of available clouds [47]. Clearly, the expected runtime of a job on a site (or cloud) is an important parameter in any such decision method.…”
Section: Scheduling Use Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cunha et al [47] consider performance differences between a local cluster and cloud resources. They assume that executing in the cloud slows down execution by a constant, applicationdependent factor, for which they propose a linear model and an empirical model, based on relative performance of eight applications on three clusters and on three cloud platforms.…”
Section: Heterogeneity Modeling At the Job Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining the available literature in hybrid clouds, we see that the majority of these studies focus on architecture / management aspects of such environments and their challenges [25]. Studies concerned with resource allocation are often either (i) focused on the selection of the public cloud by formalising it as a brokering problem (e.g., with multiple cloud providers [49] or with a distributed cloud [20]) or (ii) focused on the private DC with the possibility of bursting to public clouds [15] to cope with a momentary excess of demand in resources.…”
Section: Vm Reassignment In Decentralised and Hybrid Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Works that deal with VM allocation in hybrid data centres are often mono-objective (e.g., driven by overall cost reduction [3], SLA satisfaction [15] or minimisation of VM leasing cost [10]). In addition, they either (i) address a small scale scheduling problem with a simplistic private DC architecture: Chunlin and LaYuan [13] define a set of routines for an optimal resolution of the problem, while Bittencourt et al [10] surveys common scheduling algorithms and studies their performance on the problem, or (ii) put an emphasis on the private DC sub-problem [12].…”
Section: Vm Reassignment In Decentralised and Hybrid Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%