2010
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/219/4/042024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job life cycle management libraries for CMS workflow management projects

Abstract: Scientific analysis and simulation requires the processing and generation of millions of data samples. These processing and generation tasks are often comprised of multiple smaller tasks divided over multiple (computing) sites. This paper discusses the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) workflow infrastructure, and specifically the Python based workflow library which is used for so called task lifecycle management. The CMS workflow infrastructure consists of three layers: high level specification of the various tasks… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A new workflow management system, WMAgent [7], is much more robust against such problems, and its deployment was a great help to operations. It is a state machine rather than a messaging system, and has 100% accountability for all events processed.…”
Section: Tiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new workflow management system, WMAgent [7], is much more robust against such problems, and its deployment was a great help to operations. It is a state machine rather than a messaging system, and has 100% accountability for all events processed.…”
Section: Tiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CMS, there are at least five different submission tools and most of them provide their own monitoring system, for example, CRAB Monitoring is coupled to jobs submitted by the CRAB submission system [3] and WMAgent Monitoring is coupled to jobs submitted via the WMAgent workflow management tool [4]. Similarly, in ATLAS, there are two different workload submission systems that provide their own monitoring applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%