2009
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2009.44244567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job Control and Burnout: A Meta-Analytic Test of the Conservation of Resources Model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To have predictive validity, harmonious and obsessive passion should both explain the variance relevant outcomes; beyond simply work engagement and workaholism. Passion, engagement, and workaholism have all received extensive research with respect to their role in explaining individual differences in both wellbeing and performance (Christian et al, 2011;Forest et al, 2012;Ho & Pollack, 2014;Ng et al, 2007;Park, Baiden, Jacob, & Wagner, 2009). Unfortunately, this has not been done while taking the other constructs into consideration and thus we wanted to include some of the same measures to see if the assumptions of discriminant validity holds.…”
Section: The Predictive Validity Of Passion For Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To have predictive validity, harmonious and obsessive passion should both explain the variance relevant outcomes; beyond simply work engagement and workaholism. Passion, engagement, and workaholism have all received extensive research with respect to their role in explaining individual differences in both wellbeing and performance (Christian et al, 2011;Forest et al, 2012;Ho & Pollack, 2014;Ng et al, 2007;Park, Baiden, Jacob, & Wagner, 2009). Unfortunately, this has not been done while taking the other constructs into consideration and thus we wanted to include some of the same measures to see if the assumptions of discriminant validity holds.…”
Section: The Predictive Validity Of Passion For Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the potentially important role of culture in scientific inquiry, teaching, and practice (Hult, Ketchen, Griffith, Finnegan, Gonzalez‐Padron, Harmancioglu, & Cavusgil, ; Kittler, ) plus literature suggesting similar working conditions might be perceived differently due to cultural variation (Hattrup, Mueller, & Joens, ; Taras, Kirkman, & Steel, ; Park, Jacob, Wagner, & Baiden, ), only a few studies provide cross‐cultural insight relating to JD‐R theory (see Rattrie & Kittler, ). Furthermore, there is reason to believe organisations would benefit from frameworks valid beyond a national scope that function across multiple cultures (Stone‐Romero, Stone, & Salas, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this moment, most research studies are using four self‐report inventories that assess different burnout conceptualizations (for more details, see Qiao & Schaufeli, ). However, previous reviews of cross‐sectional research papers focused only on the MBI literature (Alarcon et al ., ; Lee & Ashforth, ) or reported that research papers rarely used other measures except the MBI (Halbesleben, ; Park, Jacob, Wagner, & Baiden, ; Taris, ). Similar reports regarding the usage of the MBI can also be found in the reviews that analysed research studies on interventions (Awa et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%