2010
DOI: 10.5651/jaas.23.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job attitudes and mental health of nonpermanent employees

Abstract: The number of nonpermanent employees has been sharply increasing recently. With such situations, this paper aims to clarify the job attitude of the nonpermanent employees, focusing on organizational commitment, mental health and work motivation in particular. A survey was conducted among employees of 17 social welfare corporations. It was revealed that nonpermanent employees have higher levels of affective and internalized factors of organizational commitment and work motivation than permanent employees, and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to regular employment, M. Inoue (2012) argued that non-regular work may negatively affect an individual's mental health due to employment insecurity, severe work conditions, and limited opportunities for job training and career development. Although previous research conducted in the United States and European Union countries showed that non-regular workers' mental health is worse than those in regular employment (Virtanen et al, 2005), many earlier Japanese studies failed to confirm the difference in mental health between regular and non-regular workers (Imai, 2018;Matsuyama, 2010;Mori, Iwata, & Tanaka, 2014;Morita, 2018;Nakahara, 2007;Takahashi et al, 2014;Uehara et al, 2014). Only A.…”
Section: Non-regular Employment and Organizational Stress In Japanmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Compared to regular employment, M. Inoue (2012) argued that non-regular work may negatively affect an individual's mental health due to employment insecurity, severe work conditions, and limited opportunities for job training and career development. Although previous research conducted in the United States and European Union countries showed that non-regular workers' mental health is worse than those in regular employment (Virtanen et al, 2005), many earlier Japanese studies failed to confirm the difference in mental health between regular and non-regular workers (Imai, 2018;Matsuyama, 2010;Mori, Iwata, & Tanaka, 2014;Morita, 2018;Nakahara, 2007;Takahashi et al, 2014;Uehara et al, 2014). Only A.…”
Section: Non-regular Employment and Organizational Stress In Japanmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, a study by Matsuyama [28] on workers who are engaged in welfare work found no effect of their employment status on their mental health. Matsuyama [28], who examined the relationship between employment status and organizational commitment, found that nonregular employees have stronger affective and internalized factors of organizational commitment than regular employees do. The former is a concept similar to Allen and Meyer's [29] affective commitment, which indicates an emotional attachment to the organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The former is a concept similar to Allen and Meyer's [29] affective commitment, which indicates an emotional attachment to the organization. The latter indicates that the organization's values match the employees' personal values and that they want to work for the organization [28]. Another study shows that regular employees have higher affective commitment than non-regular employees do [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation