2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2004.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job and vacancy competition in empirical matching functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of these proxies could produce biased estimates (Broersma/Ours, 1999;Anderson/Burgess, 2000;Fahr/Sunde, 2005;Sunde, 2007). Therefore, Anderson/Burgess (2000) propose interpreting the empirical matching elasticities as quantities that are obtained from a "reduced" model.…”
Section: Pooled Ols and Fixed Effects Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of these proxies could produce biased estimates (Broersma/Ours, 1999;Anderson/Burgess, 2000;Fahr/Sunde, 2005;Sunde, 2007). Therefore, Anderson/Burgess (2000) propose interpreting the empirical matching elasticities as quantities that are obtained from a "reduced" model.…”
Section: Pooled Ols and Fixed Effects Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical matching functions have been estimated for Germany before (see e.g. Entorf, 1998; Fahr and Sunde, 2004, 2005, 2006a, 2006b; Gross, 1997). However, all these estimates for Germany have used data on a quarterly or even an annual basis, and the most recent estimates date back to the late 1990s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the employability of job seekers as well as the probability of vacancies becoming filled might differ (e.g. Anderson and Burgess, 2000; Fahr and Sunde, 2005). In order to take into account job and vacancy competition between different types of vacancies we divide the unemployment and vacancy stocks into groups.…”
Section: Matching In the Labour Market: Models And Datamentioning
confidence: 99%