Untitled

Nakajima, Akira; Saiki, Chinatsu; Hashimoto, Kazuhito; Watanabe, Toshiya

doi:10.1023/a:1013199105688

Cited by 43 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…43,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] Examples of bottom-up approaches include chemical deposition, [60][61][62][63][64][65][66] layer-by-layer (LBL) deposition, 52,53,57,60,62 hydrogen bonding, 67 and colloidal assemblies. 35,43,59,[68][69][70] There are also methods based on the combination of both bottom-up and top-down approaches, for example, casting of polymer solution and phase separation, 71 and electrospinning. 63,[72][73][74] In the following section, different approaches are addressed in detail.…”

Section: Structures Of Natural Superhydrophobic (Sh) Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Superhydrophobic surfaces have drawn a lot of interest both in academia and in industry because of the self-cleaning properties. This critical review focuses on the recent progress (within the last three years) in the preparation, theoretical modeling, and applications of superhydrophobic surfaces. The preparation approaches are reviewed according to categorized approaches such as bottom-up, top-down, and combination approaches. The advantages and limitations of each strategy are summarized and compared. Progress in theoretical modeling of surface design and wettability behavior focuses on the transition state of superhydrophobic surfaces and the role of the roughness factor. Finally, the problems/obstacles related to applicability of superhydrophobic surfaces in real life are addressed. This review should be of interest to students and scientists interested specifically in superhydrophobic surfaces but also to scientists and industries focused in material chemistry in general.

show abstract

Section: Structures Of Natural Superhydrophobic (Sh) Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3). In addi tion to these methods, transparent superhydrophobic coatings have been developed using phase separation, 20) coagulation control, 21) or plasma CVD of fluorosilane with controlling fine roughness. 51) We have prepared a transparent superhydrophobic polymer film using a screenprinting method.…”

Section: Transparencymentioning

confidence: 99%

Design of a Transparent Hydrophobic Coating

Nakajima

2004

J. Ceram. Soc. Japan

117

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The role of the different additives seems to be that hydrogen peroxide controlled the ratio of Ce 3+ /Ce 4+ in the solution [2,20], colloidal silica acted as an anticorrosive additive due to its hydrophobic effect [21,22] and silane blocked the defects in the conversion coating [23,24]. ECS Transactions, 1 (9) 133-152 (2006) ) unless CC License in place (see abstract).…”

Section: Ecs Transactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…12a) it is very difficult to determine reasonable film thickness values based on the sputtering data. The peaks for C and Si are assumed to be due to incorporation of silane and colloidal silica, respectively, in the protective surface layers.The role of the different additives seems to be that hydrogen peroxide controlled the ratio of Ce 3+ /Ce 4+ in the solution [2,20], colloidal silica acted as an anticorrosive additive due to its hydrophobic effect [21,22] and silane blocked the defects in the conversion coating [23,24]. ECS Transactions, 1 (9) 133-152 (2006) ) unless CC License in place (see abstract).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Corrosion Resistance of Different Galvanized Steels Treated in Cerium Salt-Based Solutions

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Various treatments based on cerium salts have been evaluated in an attempt to develop surface modification treatments for galvanized steels that can replace the presently used processes that are based on hexavalent chromium. The substrates used in this study included pure zinc, electroplated zinc and zinc-nickel as well as hot dipped zinc and zinc-iron. In initial screening tests Zn and hot dipped Zn were immersed in Ce(NO 3 ) 3 or CeCl 3 + H 2 O 2 solutions at different concentrations and treatment times. The films formed in these solutions were sealed in Na 2 SiO 3 . A new conversion coating process for electrogalvanized (EG) steel based on a cerium nitrate solution with several additives such as colloidal silica and silane has been developed that reduces the total treatment time to 70 seconds. The treated EG sample passed the 72 h salt spray test without white rusting. Similar improvements of corrosion resistance were obtained for the other types of galvanized steel. IntroductionRare earth metal salts were introduced as possible candidates for producing chromate-free protective coatings by Hinton et al [1][2]. Mansfeld et al developed the Ce-Mo surface modification process for Al alloys that resulted in excellent pitting resistance in 0.5 N NaCl [3][4][5]. Aramaki reported a process that produced a hydrated Ce 2 O 3 film on pure zinc that had been treated in 1 mM Ce(NO 3 ) 3 [6-9]. The coating layer that consisted mainly of Ce 2 O 3 and contained a small amount of Ce +4 was remarkably protective during exposure to NaCl [6]. Aramaki modified the coating layer with Na 3 PO 4 to produce a self-healing effect that provided good corrosion protection especially in a scratched area [9]. Song and Mansfeld reported that the corrosion resistance and coating structure of cerium-based conversion films depended on the surface chemistry of different types of galvanized steel [10]. Colloidal silica and silane were employed as additives to enhance the corrosion protection of EG provided by a conversion coating that was formed in a molybdate-phosphate solution [11]. In the present study, several cerium salt-based solutions were used to enhance the corrosion resistance of pure Zn, electroplated Zn (EG), electroplated Zn-Ni, hot dipped Zn and hot dipped Zn-Fe. In initial screening tests Zn and hot dipped Zn were immersed in Ce(NO 3 ) 3 or CeCl 3 + H 2 O 2 at different concentrations and treatment times [12]. The films formed in these solutions were sealed in Na 2 SiO 3 . The optimum treatment conditions were determined using a factorial design approach. The effect of the substrate chemistry was studied for electroplated zinc and zinc-nickel as well as hot dipped zinc-iron in a ECS Transactions, 1 (9) 133-152 (2006) 10.1149/1.2215584, copyright The Electrochemical Society 133 ) unless CC License in place (see abstract). ecsdl.org/site/terms_use address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see 134.117.-134.62 Downloaded on 2015-06-13 to IP 134Ce(NO 3 ) 3 solution. Based on the results of these studies two different types o...

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 43 publications

References 3 publications

What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces

What do we need for a superhydrophobic surface? A review on the recent progress in the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces

Design of a Transparent Hydrophobic Coating

Evaluation of the Corrosion Resistance of Different Galvanized Steels Treated in Cerium Salt-Based Solutions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About