2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1011917625457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is COBE normalized, so that the fluctuation normalization at z = 0 in a sphere of radius 8 h −1 Mpc is σ 8 h −1 = 0.970, and the fluctuation normalization at z = 3 spherically filtered on the scale of the Jeans length for T = 2 × 10 4 K gas is σ J (z = 3) = 1.59. The model is consistent with current constraints from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) (Stompor et al 2001;Netterfield et al 2002;Pryke et al 2002), big bang nucleosynthesis (O'Meara et al 2001), and large-scale structure (Percival et al 2001;Szalay et al 2001), as well as the constraint on the size of mass fluctuations on the scale of the Jeans length at 2 < z < 4 imposed by the measured flux per pixel distribution of the Lyα forest ). We use 512 3 particles on a 1024 3 mesh in a box of comoving side L box = 25 h −1 Mpc.…”
Section: Cosmological Modelsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The model is COBE normalized, so that the fluctuation normalization at z = 0 in a sphere of radius 8 h −1 Mpc is σ 8 h −1 = 0.970, and the fluctuation normalization at z = 3 spherically filtered on the scale of the Jeans length for T = 2 × 10 4 K gas is σ J (z = 3) = 1.59. The model is consistent with current constraints from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) (Stompor et al 2001;Netterfield et al 2002;Pryke et al 2002), big bang nucleosynthesis (O'Meara et al 2001), and large-scale structure (Percival et al 2001;Szalay et al 2001), as well as the constraint on the size of mass fluctuations on the scale of the Jeans length at 2 < z < 4 imposed by the measured flux per pixel distribution of the Lyα forest ). We use 512 3 particles on a 1024 3 mesh in a box of comoving side L box = 25 h −1 Mpc.…”
Section: Cosmological Modelsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Dodelson et al (2002) inverted the angular clustering in an early data release of the SDSS and found = 0.14 +0.11 −0.06 , in agreement with our constraint. Szalay et al (2001) used a KL estimate of the power spectrum from the SDSS to derive a similar range of values: = 0.188 ± 0.04 and σ g 8 = 0.915 ± 0.06 for a flat universe with cosmological constant. A consensus seems to be emerging on the shape and amplitude of the galaxy power spectrum for bright, optically selected galaxies, as remarked upon by Hoyle et al (1999).…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the speed of our code makes feasible to construct a large number of mock galaxy catalogues in a reasonable CPU time from which a reliable estimation of errors and covariance matrices can be derived. Applications along these lines to imaging data in the SDSS survey will be considered elsewhere (Connolly et al 2001;Dodelson et al 2001;Scranton et al 2001;Szalay et al 2001;Tegmark et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%