2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1026441903474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data by Dittmer et al [4] and Thomas and Harrison [6] agreed reasonably with the present results to within ±0.14 and ±0.15% in density, respectively. Figure 2 shows relative density deviations of the present measurements from the Helmholtz-type equation of state proposed by Miyamoto and Watanabe [15]. The behaviors of density values calculated from the pressure-explicit mBWR-type equation of state developed by Younglove and Ely [16] and the multi-parameter Helmholtz-type equation of state developed by Span and Wagner [17] are also included for comparisons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The data by Dittmer et al [4] and Thomas and Harrison [6] agreed reasonably with the present results to within ±0.14 and ±0.15% in density, respectively. Figure 2 shows relative density deviations of the present measurements from the Helmholtz-type equation of state proposed by Miyamoto and Watanabe [15]. The behaviors of density values calculated from the pressure-explicit mBWR-type equation of state developed by Younglove and Ely [16] and the multi-parameter Helmholtz-type equation of state developed by Span and Wagner [17] are also included for comparisons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the purpose of comparison of the present statistical model with available analytical models, we have selected the thermodynamic models for hydrocarbons recently published by Miyamoto and Watanabe [6][7][8][9] which cover a wide range of temperatures and pressures. For propane the equation covers from the triple point temperature (85.48 K) to 623 K, at pressures up to 103 MPa, and at densities up to 741 kg · m −3 ; for n-butane from 134.87 to 589 K, at pressures up to 69 MPa, and at densities up to 745 kg · m −3 ; and for isobutane from 113.56 K (the triple point temperature) to 573 K, at pressures up to 35 MPa, and at densities up to 749 kg · m −3 .…”
Section: Results and Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these equations have exhibited some noticeable defects, such as poor agreement with experimental data at moderate densities. On the other hand, we can use complex equations of state with many constants (Benedict-Webb-Rubin [1] (BWR) EOS, Lee-Kessler [1] EOS, Benedict-Webb-Rubin-Starling-Nishiumi [1] EOS, modified BWR [1,2] (MBWR) EOS, Jacobsen-Stewart (JS) [2,3] EOS, Tillner-Roth-Watanabe-Wagner (TRWW) [4][5][6][7][8][9] EOS, etc.). These equations are more complicated and highly accurate for states where data are available, but they have no insight into the microstructure of matter and often exhibit poor agreement with experimental data outside interpolation limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations