Untitled

Papageorgiou, Costas; Wells, Adrian

doi:10.1023/a:1023962332399

Cited by 414 publications

(162 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

137

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1. In case the model does not fit to the data, the final model obtained in patients with major depressive disorder by Papageorgiou and Wells (2003) was tested. In the case both tested models would have insufficient fit, modification indices provided by LISREL were inspected in order to change the model in a theoretically consistent way in order to obtain a good fit of the model to the data.…”

Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The metacognitive model of rumination and depression has been tested in clinical and non-clinical samples by Papageorgiou and Wells (2003). The results from their study showed that the final model obtained in clinically depressed patients was different from the model obtained in undergraduates.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1, the hypothesized paths between metacognitive efficiency and metacognitions (i.e., positive beliefs about rumination and negative beliefs about rumination concerning the uncontrollability and harm) were reversed, which led the authors to conclude that the importance of metacognitive efficiency was unclear. Reversing these two paths yielded a reasonable to good fit of the model to the data (Papageorgiou and Wells 2003). Noteworthy to mention, another study by Roelofs et al (2007) tested the core variables of the model (i.e., this study did not include the variable metacognitive efficiency) in a sample of undergraduates by means of structural equation modeling.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Positive and Negative Beliefs About Depressive Rumination: A Psychometric Evaluation of Two Self-Report Scales and a Test of a Clinical Metacognitive Model of Rumination and Depression

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study sought to investigate psychometric properties of the Positive Beliefs about Rumination Scale (PBRS) and the Negative Beliefs about Rumination Scale (NBRS), two self-report measures of metacognitive beliefs of depressive rumination, in patients with major depressive disorder (N = 179). Confirmatory factor analysis of the PBRS showed good fit of the hypothesized one-factor model. The previously proposed two-factor model of the NBRS was supported after implementation of some modifications. The scales showed adequate to good internal consistency and validity was supported on some indices. Finally, the metacognitive model of rumination and depression was tested by means of structural equation modeling. After implementation of some theoretically consistent modifications, the model provided a good fit to the data. Clinical implications of the findings, including the implementation of a metacognitivefocused cognitive therapy of depression, and suggestions for future research are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Positive and Negative Beliefs About Depressive Rumination: A Psychometric Evaluation of Two Self-Report Scales and a Test of a Clinical Metacognitive Model of Rumination and Depression

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The S-REF model (Wells & Matthews, 1996) is a transdiagnostic model describing the contribution of metacognitions to engagement in the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome (CAS), which consists of RNT along with heightened self-focus, maladaptive coping behavior, and threat monitoring. The S-REF model argues that the CAS causally contributes to emotional disorder, and there is evidence that metacognitions are associated with a range of symptoms and disorders including depression (Papageorgiou & Wells, 2003;Roelofs et al, 2007), anxiety (Yilmaz, Gencoz, & Wells, 2011), GAD (Wells & Carter, 2001), social anxiety disorder (McEvoy et al, 2009), obsessive compulsive disorder and panic disorder (Cucchi et al, 2012). van der Heiden et al (2010) used worry as the primary outcome variable given that their focus was on the core feature of GAD.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intolerance of uncertainty and negative metacognitive beliefs as transdiagnostic mediators of repetitive negative thinking in a clinical sample with anxiety disorders

McEvoy

Mahoney

2013

Journal of Anxiety Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to replicate and extend a hierarchical model of vulnerability to worry, with neuroticism and extraversion as higher-order factors and negative metacognitions and intolerance of uncertainty as second-order factors. The model also included a transdiagnostic measure of repetitive negative thinking (RNT) and depression symptoms as outcome variables to determine whether relationships would extend beyond worry, which has traditionally been studied within the context of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Participants (N = 99) were referrals to a specialist anxiety disorders clinic with a principal anxiety disorder who completed a battery of self-report questionnaires assessing neuroticism, extraversion, metacognitions, intolerance of uncertainty, worry, RNT, and depression symptoms.Mediational analyses using bootstrapping provided support for transdiagnostic and diagnosis-specific mediation effects. Negative metacognitions fully mediated the relationship between neuroticism and RNT for the whole sample and for subsamples with and without generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Intolerance of uncertainty mediated the relationship between neuroticism and worry (for the whole sample and for those with GAD) and between neuroticism and RNT (for those with GAD).Implications for theory, treatment, and nosology are discussed.

show abstract

“…They propose that psychological disturbance is maintained by a combination of perseverative thinking styles, maladaptive attentional routines, and dysfunctional behaviors. The S-REF theory has led to the development of disorder-specific models of [8], generalised anxiety disorder [7], obsessive-compulsive disorder [3], post-traumatic stress disorder [6] and body dismorphic disorder [4]. Cooper and Osman [9] suggest that patients with BDD do indeed engage in metacognitive processing in relation to their concerns with appearance.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Develop and Validate a Metacognitive-Cognitive-Behavioral Model for Body Dysmorphic Disorder

Donyavi¹,

Rabiei²,

Nikfarjam³

et al. 2015

OJMP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How to cite this paper: Donyavi, V., Rabiei, M., Nikfarjam, M. and Rahnejat, A.M. (2015) AbstractThe purpose of this study was to develop and validate a metacognitive-cognitive-behavioral model for body dysmorphic disorder. A sample of 800 participants (400 males and 400 females) was selected randomly and questionnaires were administered to them. Structure analysis was used to test the factor structure validity of the metacognitive-cognitive-behavioral model for body dysmorphic disorder. Results of the structure analysis revealed and supported a metacognitive-cognitivebehavioral model for body dysmorphic disorder. Also, the results showed that the model had the best fit to the data and was closely related to the theoretical assumptions. The model presented in this study illustrates a multidimensional approach that the model focuses on the metacognitivecognitive-behavioral dimensions; hence, the model presented in this study is a new explanatory model. The model may prompt future research into body dysmorphic disorder and facilitate clinical treatment and case formulation.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 414 publications

References 23 publications

Positive and Negative Beliefs About Depressive Rumination: A Psychometric Evaluation of Two Self-Report Scales and a Test of a Clinical Metacognitive Model of Rumination and Depression

Positive and Negative Beliefs About Depressive Rumination: A Psychometric Evaluation of Two Self-Report Scales and a Test of a Clinical Metacognitive Model of Rumination and Depression

Intolerance of uncertainty and negative metacognitive beliefs as transdiagnostic mediators of repetitive negative thinking in a clinical sample with anxiety disorders

Develop and Validate a Metacognitive-Cognitive-Behavioral Model for Body Dysmorphic Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About