Untitled

Patterson, Miles L.; Stockbridge, Erica L.

doi:10.1023/a:1022996522793

Cited by 51 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These so-called “thin-slice” judgments, operationally understood as impressions formed after 5 min or less, are reliable across contexts (Ambady & Rosenthal, 1992). In some cases, these thin-slice judgments are even more accurate than those made after a longer period of time (Patterson & Stockbridge, 1998). Accordingly, we isolated 30-s slices from each videotaped interaction for our coding purposes.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interacting in Flow

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Theorists have long noted the nebulousness of dyadic rapport and its nonverbal correlates. In response to Tickle-Degnen’s call for a more theoretically complete analysis of the rapport construct, we empirically evaluated her adaptation of Csíkszentmihályi’s optimal experience model with the hope of better conceptualizing rapport’s behavioral manifestations. Dyads ( Ndyad = 50) engaged in two interdependent tasks and completed a battery of post-task measures gauging their mood and experiences of rapport. To complement self-report measures, we coded rapport-based behavior using both subjective (thin-slice judgments) and objective (Motion Energy Analysis) methodologies. According to Tickle-Degnen’s model, dyadic exchanges with moderate levels of expressivity and interpersonal coordination should yield the highest levels of rapport. Although data from our objective coding did not trend in this manner, subjective measurements of coordinated expressivity matched the paradigm’s prediction. To our knowledge, this is the first study to empirically support Tickle-Degnen’s hypothesis and a novel step toward clarifying the rapport construct.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interacting in Flow

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Based on these video sequences, perceivers in the two different judgment conditions rated targets' extraversion using a third-person version of the two extraversion items of the German short form of the Big Five Inventory (Rammstedt & John, 2007). Studies typically rule out control in judgment processes, for instance, “by seriously crippling the participants' expenditure of effort on inefficient mental processes (e.g., by imposing mental load or time pressure)” (Wegner & Bargh, 1998, p. 449; see also Albrechtsen et al, 2009; Ambady, 2010; Horstmann, Hausmann, & Ryf, 2010; Patterson & Stockbridge, 1998; Phillips, Channon, Tunstall, Hedenstrom, & Lyons, 2008; Tracy & Robins, 2008). Accordingly, we operationalized a deliberate versus an intuitive judgment condition.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dual lens model: A comprehensive framework for understanding self–other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance.

Hirschmüller¹,

Egloff²,

Nestler³

et al. 2013

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An integrative framework for the examination of self-other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance is outlined that integrates dualistic approaches to personality, behavior, and personality judgments within the Brunswikian (1956) lens model. The dual lens model (DLM) distinguishes between explicit and implicit self-concepts of personality, controlled and automatic cues, and deliberate and intuitive personality judgments. In a first application of the DLM, targets (N = 56) were videotaped during short self-introductions, and direct and indirect measures of extraversion as well as a number of physical, kinesic, vocal, and verbal cues were obtained. Perceivers judged targets' extraversion based on these short video sequences either in a global judgment condition (Study 1: N = 95) or in a deliberate versus an intuitive judgment condition (Study 2: N = 82). In both studies, results showed that extraversion judgments at zero acquaintance were correlated with both the explicit and the implicit self-concept of extraversion (self-other agreement). The self-other correlation for explicit extraversion was fully mediated by the utilization of valid controlled cues, and it was fully mediated by the utilization of valid automatic cues for the implicit self. Whereas judgment condition did not moderate self-other agreement, perceivers' intuitive judgment style was associated with higher levels of self-other agreement, a relation that could be explained by DLM analyses. Results underline the utility of the proposed framework for the study of interpersonal judgments.

show abstract

“…In addition to interindividual variations in facial affect sensitivity, differences may be seen within the same individual over time. Factors that have been shown to affect facial affect sensitivity include cognitive load (Patterson & Stockbridge, 1998; Tracy & Robins, 2008), mood congruence (Niedenthal, Brauer, Halberstadt, & Innes-Ker, 2001; Niedenthal, Halberstadt, Margolin, & Innes-Ker, 2000), the use of benzodiazepine medication (Blair & Curran, 1999; Coupland, Singh, Sustrik, Ting, & Blair, 2003; Zangara, Blair, & Curran, 2002), and even the use of Botox (Havas, Glenberg, Gutowski, Lucarelli, & Davidson, 2010). Additionally, individuals may display varied sensitivities to different emotions (Adolphs, 2002; Sprengelmeyer, Rausch, Eysel, & Przuntek, 1998) and in different situations.…”

Section: Facial Affect Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

That “poker face” just might lose you the game! The impact of expressive suppression and mimicry on sensitivity to facial expressions of emotion.

Schneider¹,

Hempel²,

Lynch³

2013

Emotion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Successful interpersonal functioning often requires both the ability to mask inner feelings and the ability to accurately recognize others' expressions--but what if effortful control of emotional expressions impacts the ability to accurately read others? In this study, we examined the influence of self-controlled expressive suppression and mimicry on facial affect sensitivity--the speed with which one can accurately identify gradually intensifying facial expressions of emotion. Muscle activity of the brow (corrugator, related to anger), upper lip (levator, related to disgust), and cheek (zygomaticus, related to happiness) were recorded using facial electromyography while participants randomized to one of three conditions (Suppress, Mimic, and No-Instruction) viewed a series of six distinct emotional expressions (happiness, sadness, fear, anger, surprise, and disgust) as they morphed from neutral to full expression. As hypothesized, individuals instructed to suppress their own facial expressions showed impairment in facial affect sensitivity. Conversely, mimicry of emotion expressions appeared to facilitate facial affect sensitivity. Results suggest that it is difficult for a person to be able to simultaneously mask inner feelings and accurately "read" the facial expressions of others, at least when these expressions are at low intensity. The combined behavioral and physiological data suggest that the strategies an individual selects to control his or her own expression of emotion have important implications for interpersonal functioning.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 51 publications

References 17 publications

Interacting in Flow

Interacting in Flow

The dual lens model: A comprehensive framework for understanding self–other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance.

That “poker face” just might lose you the game! The impact of expressive suppression and mimicry on sensitivity to facial expressions of emotion.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About