2009
DOI: 10.1155/2009/567875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jitter Estimation Algorithms for Detection of Pathological Voices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increase in jitter% shows that voice quality is rough or dysphonic. 23 Sanal et al 24 reported that mean F0 was 137 Hz, jitter% was 16.30, shimmer% was 14.51 and MFT was 5.08 in patients with frontolateral laryngectomy; while these values were mean F0 155 Hz, Jitter% 19.05, Shimmer% 15.45 and MFT 3.3 s in cricohyoidopexy cases and mean F0 147 Hz, Jitter% 15.40, Shimmer% 21.73 and MFT 7.05 s for cordectomy cases. MPT was very low in all partial laryngectomy patients and jitter% and shimmer% values appeared to be much increased.…”
Section: Quality Of Life Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Increase in jitter% shows that voice quality is rough or dysphonic. 23 Sanal et al 24 reported that mean F0 was 137 Hz, jitter% was 16.30, shimmer% was 14.51 and MFT was 5.08 in patients with frontolateral laryngectomy; while these values were mean F0 155 Hz, Jitter% 19.05, Shimmer% 15.45 and MFT 3.3 s in cricohyoidopexy cases and mean F0 147 Hz, Jitter% 15.40, Shimmer% 21.73 and MFT 7.05 s for cordectomy cases. MPT was very low in all partial laryngectomy patients and jitter% and shimmer% values appeared to be much increased.…”
Section: Quality Of Life Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The jitter refers to the change in the duration of consecutive glottal cycles, while the shimmer reflects the changes in amplitude of consecutive glottal cycles. The study described in (Silva et al (2009)) focused on a comparative evaluation of different methods to estimate the amount of jitter in speech signals with a target on their ability to detect pathological voices. Results showed that there were significant differences in the performance of the various algorithms, the best techniques being not necessarily the most commonly used.…”
Section: Biomedical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study 22 examined the use of a new proposed measurement for frequency perturbation called LocJitt, which provides better accuracy.This measurement was considered more reliable when used either with MDVP or with Praat. The only case in which Jitt exceeds the LocJitt measurement was when relative jitter was used in Praat.…”
Section: In a Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%