2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jiangnan Orogen, South China: A ~970–820 Ma Rodinia margin accretionary belt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
75
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
(332 reference statements)
6
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ca. 820-710 Ma sedimentation and bimodal magmatism due to the Nanhua rifting across South China [66][67][68] also matches well with the rifting-related records of the southeastern Tarim craton (see the above section). A connection between the northern Tarim craton and the northern and western Yangtze block is indicated by the same prominent age spectrum at ca.…”
Section: -750supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ca. 820-710 Ma sedimentation and bimodal magmatism due to the Nanhua rifting across South China [66][67][68] also matches well with the rifting-related records of the southeastern Tarim craton (see the above section). A connection between the northern Tarim craton and the northern and western Yangtze block is indicated by the same prominent age spectrum at ca.…”
Section: -750supporting
confidence: 78%
“…South China was assembled by the connection of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks at ca. 820-800 Ma [68] and occupied a position adjacent to North India and western Australia with respect to Rodinia (Figure 7), based on comprehensive geologic, geochemical, geochronological, paleomagnetic, and faunal data [73]. We further suggest a location of the Tarim craton between South China and North India (Figure 7), according to the following lines of evidence.…”
Section: -750mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The Jiangnan Orogen along the southeastern margin of the Yangtze Block is featured by Neoproterozoic arc/backarc basin assemblages. It has been divided into the Mesoproterozoic to Neoproterozoic composite Huaiyu terrane and the Neoproterozoic Jiuling and Southwest terranes (Yao et al, 2019;Lin et al, 2018). Shortly after the amalgamation of these terranes in the Neoproterozoic, the Jiangnan Orogen underwent regional extension, resulting in the development of the Neoproterozoic Nanhua Rift Basin (Li et al, 2003;Wang and Li, 2003;Shu, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…geological studies during the past decades (e.g., Zhao and Cawood, 2012;Zhang and Zheng, 2013;Li Z X et al, 2014). Yet lots of efforts were made to characterize its Neoproterozoic tectonics (e.g., Li et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2017;Xia et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2018;Yao et al, 2019) and less attention has been paid to the earlier crustal history (e.g., Cawood et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020 and references therein). The Yangtze Block and the Cathaysia Block, the two constituent Precambrian blocks of South China, feature a prolonged Archean to Mesoproterozoic history of continental growth and subsequent modification that built the ancient crust (e.g., Li et al, 1995;Charvet et al, 1996;Zhao and Cawood, 2012) (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%