2008
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195178326.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jewish Music and Modernity

Abstract: Is there really such a thing as Jewish music? And does it survive as an expressive practice of worship and identity against modernity? This book poses such questions in new and critical ways by surveying a vast diasporic landscape, taking into consideration the many ways music historically witnessed the confrontation between modern Jews and the world around them, from the waning of the Middle Ages until the Holocaust. The book examines the confluence of many styles and repertories as Jewish music: the sacred a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like debates about Armenian music, they were tied up with imagined memories of classical antiquity, fuelled by geopolitical concerns, and profoundly influenced by the views of European musicologists. To give another example, the cultural memory of Jewish music that emerged in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was similarly built around the notion of a lost homeland, depended on the idealisation of rural life by an urban intelligentsia, and reflected growing tensions between confessional and national identity (Bohlman, 2008). The reinvention of collective musical memories was thus a widespread phenomenon in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, precipitated by increasing contacts between diverse peoples, technological and social changes related to urbanisation, and the global circulation of ideas concerning the connection between music and nationhood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like debates about Armenian music, they were tied up with imagined memories of classical antiquity, fuelled by geopolitical concerns, and profoundly influenced by the views of European musicologists. To give another example, the cultural memory of Jewish music that emerged in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was similarly built around the notion of a lost homeland, depended on the idealisation of rural life by an urban intelligentsia, and reflected growing tensions between confessional and national identity (Bohlman, 2008). The reinvention of collective musical memories was thus a widespread phenomenon in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, precipitated by increasing contacts between diverse peoples, technological and social changes related to urbanisation, and the global circulation of ideas concerning the connection between music and nationhood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A chronological delineation of musical history can display the development of music and culture when the definition of modernity is historicized from the late 16th to the late 20th century in Europe. This setup of time and space has produced the multiple hierarchies of genre, race, and class, for example, the tradition and invention of Jewish music (Bohlman, 2008), the intersection of modernity and nationality in Bartók’s case in Hungary (Schneider, 2006), and the imagination of modernity between South Africa and the West in music (Erlmann, 1999). A problem in this approach is that the progress of worldwide modernity is never synchronized.…”
Section: Popular Music and Modernity In China’s Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Klabriaspartie was the most popular Jewish theatrical production in Europe. It was performed more than 5,000 times before the rise of Nazism in 1938 (Bohlman, 2008;Wacks, 2002, pp. 57-58).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%