2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112001007406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet vectoring using synthetic jets

Abstract: The interaction between a conventional rectangular (primary) air jet and a co-flowing synthetic jet is investigated experimentally. The nozzles of both jets have the same long dimension but the aspect ratio of the synthetic jet orifice is 25 times larger. Detailed particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements of the flow in the midspan plane show that primary jet fluid is directed into the synthetic jet orifice and the interaction between the jets leads to the formation of a closed recirculating flow dom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
114
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
114
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A large operational difference between continuous and synthetic jets is that the latter do not need an external fluid supply and therefore can be easily integrated in complex geometries, making them attractive actuators for flow control. Applications of synthetic jets, such as separation control (Dandois et al 2007), turbulent boundary layer control (Rathnasingham & Breuer 2003;Canton et al 2016), virtual aeroshaping (Mittal & Rampunggoon 2002), thrust vectoring (Smith & Glezer 2002;Luo & Xia 2005), heat transfer (Persoons et al 2009) or propulsion (Athanassiadis & Hart 2016), include, but are not limited to, applications with a crossflow. For most of these applications, the specific direction of the synthetic jet is important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large operational difference between continuous and synthetic jets is that the latter do not need an external fluid supply and therefore can be easily integrated in complex geometries, making them attractive actuators for flow control. Applications of synthetic jets, such as separation control (Dandois et al 2007), turbulent boundary layer control (Rathnasingham & Breuer 2003;Canton et al 2016), virtual aeroshaping (Mittal & Rampunggoon 2002), thrust vectoring (Smith & Glezer 2002;Luo & Xia 2005), heat transfer (Persoons et al 2009) or propulsion (Athanassiadis & Hart 2016), include, but are not limited to, applications with a crossflow. For most of these applications, the specific direction of the synthetic jet is important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other fluidic jet vectoring schemes may not require Coanda surfaces, but typically require larger control flows and combinations of blowing and suction such as demonstrated by Smith and Glezer [6], Bettridge et al [7], and Hammond and Redekopp [8]. Vectoring using a Coanda surface and a synthetic jet control was demonstrated by Pack and Seifert [9].…”
Section: Thermal Spray Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments demonstrated the importance of vortex ring pinch off in self-propelled vehicles. Synthetic jet in air is also intensively researched [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The geometrical parameters have a great effect on its fluidic characteristic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%