2012
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/39/6/063001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet substructure at the Tevatron and LHC: new results, new tools, new benchmarks

Abstract: In this paper, we review recent theoretical progress and the latest experimental results in jet substructure from the Tevatron and the LHC. We review the status of and outlook for calculation and simulation tools for studying jet substructure. Following up on the report of the Boost 2010 workshop, we present a new set of benchmark comparisons of substructure techniques, focusing on the set of variables and grooming methods that are collectively known as 'top taggers'. To facilitate further exploration, we have… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
331
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(207 reference statements)
0
331
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in phenomenological studies, larger jets receive more pileup contamination and are commonplace in substructure studies where correcting more than only a jet's p T becomes important [34][35][36]. We choose R = 0.7 as a compromise between these applications.…”
Section: Jhep10(2014)059mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in phenomenological studies, larger jets receive more pileup contamination and are commonplace in substructure studies where correcting more than only a jet's p T becomes important [34][35][36]. We choose R = 0.7 as a compromise between these applications.…”
Section: Jhep10(2014)059mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we show results for jet mass which is considered a reasonable proxy for generic jet shapes and is used in many applications such as boosted object tagging (see [34][35][36] and references therein). First we look at jet mass for central jets with 100 GeV < p T < 200 GeV.…”
Section: Jet Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that various jet grooming techniques increase the separation in jet mass between signal and QCD jets [31,32]. Figure 9 shows this comparison: while a 4-vector pileup correction alone (left) does not allow for separation between QCD and W jet, both trimming (center) and re-clustered jet trimming (right) allow for the successful discrimination of signal and background using the jet mass.…”
Section: Comparisons To Qcdmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Many available methods for boosted top tagging exist in the literature (see for instance refs. [15,16,18,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] and references therein). In addition, several interesting proposals for boosted W tagging appeared recetly in refs.…”
Section: Tagging Of Boosted Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%