1969
DOI: 10.1038/221875a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet Propulsion and the Giant Fibre Response of Loligo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anderson and DeMont (2005) reported that fin gaits in adult L. pealei were clearly tuned to jet gait and that the two are modulated at different speeds. Anderson (1998) and Anderson and DeMont (2005) echoed the claims of Packard (1969) and O'Dor (1988) that the fin gait in steady swimming appeared to reduce deceleration during the refill period thereby reducing fluctuations in swimming speed during the locomotive cycle. In fish, potentially favorable interactions between vorticity shed from upstream structures and the main propulsor, the caudal fin, have been observed (Drucker and Lauder, 2001).…”
Section: Locomotive Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Anderson and DeMont (2005) reported that fin gaits in adult L. pealei were clearly tuned to jet gait and that the two are modulated at different speeds. Anderson (1998) and Anderson and DeMont (2005) echoed the claims of Packard (1969) and O'Dor (1988) that the fin gait in steady swimming appeared to reduce deceleration during the refill period thereby reducing fluctuations in swimming speed during the locomotive cycle. In fish, potentially favorable interactions between vorticity shed from upstream structures and the main propulsor, the caudal fin, have been observed (Drucker and Lauder, 2001).…”
Section: Locomotive Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Furthermore, the mantle narrows during swimming. Packard reported that the mantle width of hatchlings (Loligo vulgaris) reduced from 2.1 to 1.3 mm during an escape jet, which would correspond to an α of 2.6 (Packard, 1969). According to the predictions of Haury and Weihs (Fig.…”
Section: Discussion Behavior Of Humboldt Squid Paralarvaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embryonic incubation in the laboratory at cool temperatures (mean 12.2°C) produced Loligo vulgaris hatchlings that were significantly heavier (8%) and longer (7%) than embryos incubated at warmer temperatures (mean 19.5°C) (Villanueva 2000a). Larger L. vulgaris hatchlings probably have an initial competitive advantage due to their greater swimming power, which may enhance food-searching and prey-capture capacities (Packard 1969, Chen et al 1996, Villanueva et al 1996, making them less vulnerable to small predators. Thus, a compromise between the risks of long versus short embryonic incubation duration, and the resulting hatchling size and hatchling competence, probably exists.…”
Section: Embryonic Life and Paralarval Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%