1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0734-743x(99)00106-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet penetration into low density targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their experiment, a tungsten rod impacted a and β set equal to 8.5 and 2, respectively, although, at such a high impact velocity, the results show very little sensitivity to their variations. The predicted maximum penetration was 203 mm, which is in perfect agreement with the value given by the shaped charge jet hydrodynamic model according to which [20] .…”
Section: Time Historiessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their experiment, a tungsten rod impacted a and β set equal to 8.5 and 2, respectively, although, at such a high impact velocity, the results show very little sensitivity to their variations. The predicted maximum penetration was 203 mm, which is in perfect agreement with the value given by the shaped charge jet hydrodynamic model according to which [20] .…”
Section: Time Historiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As with numerical simulations, the present model also predicted, for very high impact velocities, maximum penetrations close to those given by the hydrodynamic theory governing shaped charge jet penetration. The latter model yielded eqn (20) for maximum penetration, which has been enhanced to include the cratering effect [9]. The predictions from the present system of differential equations are similar to those obtained from eqn (20) as well as a simple hydrodynamic relation for the penetration rate [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The original jet tip velocity before the impact is 8500 m/s. It is seen that replacing the steel plate with ceramic or glass plate increases the erosion of the jet, which is a result of the lower density according to the dependence of hydrodynamic penetration to density 44 . In particular, switching the front plate yielded better results as compared to the back plate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In both cases, the objective is to stop a continuous stretching jet with a tip velocity of 8 Km/s, Cutoff velocity is assumed to be the same for both configurations and the charge is initiated at a constant distance from the outer plate. Figure 18 presents the calculation results of the various effectiveness factors, based on the study presented in Ref, [12], and described above.…”
Section: Materials Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%