2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1046-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jelly-falls historic and recent observations: a review to drive future research directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
65
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(184 reference statements)
0
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the sulfide profiles in the first two days were variable, the final day showed significant increases in porewater sulfide concentrations in jellyfish plots. The accumulation of these reduced analytes was likely also enhanced by the physical presence of the jellyfish, which formed a barrier and probably impeded the transfer of dissolved oxygen to the underlying sediment (Lebrato et al, 2012), limiting chemical and biological reoxidation of iron (II) and sulfide and allowing them to accumulate and diffuse towards the sediment surface (Middelburg and Levin, 2009). Furthermore, the physical barrier created by the jellyfish carrion may have limited the ability of burrowing fauna to ventilate their burrows, thus reducing the transport of oxygen into the deeper sediment strata and limiting the reoxidation of reduced respiratory electron acceptors (Welsh, 2003), favoring their accumulation beneath the jellyfish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the sulfide profiles in the first two days were variable, the final day showed significant increases in porewater sulfide concentrations in jellyfish plots. The accumulation of these reduced analytes was likely also enhanced by the physical presence of the jellyfish, which formed a barrier and probably impeded the transfer of dissolved oxygen to the underlying sediment (Lebrato et al, 2012), limiting chemical and biological reoxidation of iron (II) and sulfide and allowing them to accumulate and diffuse towards the sediment surface (Middelburg and Levin, 2009). Furthermore, the physical barrier created by the jellyfish carrion may have limited the ability of burrowing fauna to ventilate their burrows, thus reducing the transport of oxygen into the deeper sediment strata and limiting the reoxidation of reduced respiratory electron acceptors (Welsh, 2003), favoring their accumulation beneath the jellyfish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nutrients assimilated within these blooms are often released back to the environment as one large pulse when the blooms collapse and decompose (Pitt et al, 2014). Decaying medusae often sink to the benthos in large quantities (Lebrato et al, 2012(Lebrato et al, , 2013 but virtually nothing is known about how collapsed blooms affect benthic redox conditions and infaunal communities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After the decline of such populations, organic material released into the water column from the decomposing jellyfish tissue promote a microbially dominated food web (Con-don et al 2011, Tinta et al 2012, thus altering ecosystem diversity and function. Large accumulations of jellyfish carcasses at the sea bed are an important source of labile organic material for a wide spectrum of benthic macroorganisms (for a review see Lebrato et al 2012). Nevertheless, the unconsumed jellyfish material is decomposed by microbes, and oxygen consumption together with remineralization products that accompany the decomposition may further impact the benthic biota (Billett et al 2006, West et al 2009, Lebrato et al 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%