Writers of introductory texts must grapple with the best way to draw students into the topic. Should one begin with some classics in the history of the field or introduce readers to contemporary issues that might be more immediately relatable and relevant? John Ryder's Philosophy of Education-designed both for undergraduate and for graduate education and philosophy students-splits the difference. The book initially focuses on historical arguments and then moves to a contemporary analysis of philosophy of education by considering the educational implications of conceptions of nature, knowledge, experience, and social and political philosophy. The overall result is an engaging and interesting book that features lucid discussion of some important questions in educational philosophy.The historical section of Philosophy of Education consists of four chapters, each devoted to a single thinker. In the Plato chapter, Ryder uses the Republic to show, primarily, that Plato explores how education can shape a just state and just individuals. Ryder emphasizes a few key educational questions that arise from study of the Republic, including whether education ought to prepare citizens for certain roles in society (42) and the state's control of education. Ryder's discussion of Jean-Jaques Rousseau's Emile similarly emphasizes how education might best shape the individual and citizen, but with the crucial difference that Rousseau believes we must focus on educating the individual and protect the child from society in the course of his early life.In his next chapters, Ryder argues that while Plato thought that education should prepare children for society and Rousseau believed children must be protected from society, John Dewey believed that this was a false dichotomy; he sought to reform schools into social institutions that would enable students to flourish as individuals and democratic citizens (79). Paulo Freire, in Pedagogy of the Oppressed, also viewed education as the essential mechanism for creating a just state. Unlike Dewey's vision of a genuinely democratic education that would equip students to engage fellow citizens productively, however, Freire proposed a liberatory, revolutionary pedagogy that would help students challenge their unjust, oppressive societies.In the second part of Philosophy of Education, Ryder's first chapter offers a relatively brisk overview of some educational problems related to the goals of education. (Is education a private or a social good? What is the role of censorship in education? Should schools aim to solve social injustices?) Ryder also discusses pedagogical methods, testing, tracking, and the role of education in the state.The ensuing chapter defends a conception of relational ontology. People are not radically independent like balls on a pool table that come into contact with one another (174). Rather, all people (all entities, in fact [177]) are relationally constituted. Ryder argues that there are