1999
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.67.2.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jaws: diversities of gnathological history and temporomandibular joint enterprise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Confusion and controversy over aetiology, pathogenesis, classification and subsequent treatment options remains to this day. Indeed, differing opinions on almost every facet of this disorder has led some to call for the abandoning of the term TMD (and relative synonyms such as craniomandibular disorder or TMJ disorder) as being an ''outdated and useless pseudo-syndrome, of no real clinical or scientific significance or validity'' (Nelson, 1990;Nelson and Landau, 1999).…”
Section: Diagnostic Obstaclesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Confusion and controversy over aetiology, pathogenesis, classification and subsequent treatment options remains to this day. Indeed, differing opinions on almost every facet of this disorder has led some to call for the abandoning of the term TMD (and relative synonyms such as craniomandibular disorder or TMJ disorder) as being an ''outdated and useless pseudo-syndrome, of no real clinical or scientific significance or validity'' (Nelson, 1990;Nelson and Landau, 1999).…”
Section: Diagnostic Obstaclesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…But even before James Costen, an otorhinolaryngologist, first described ear and sinus symptoms associated with temporomandibular dysfunction in 1934 (subsequently known as Costen's Syndrome) (Costen, 1934), debate has arisen as to what particular signs and symptoms constitute TMD (Nelson and Landau, 1999). This quandary is not lost on epidemiologists, who rely on accurate diagnostic criteria in order to survey trends of TMD in society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%