2016
DOI: 10.15439/2016f289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Java-HCT: An approach to increase MC/DC using Hybrid Concolic Testing for Java programs

Abstract: Abstract-Modified Condition / Decision Coverage (MC/DC) is the second strongest coverage criterion in white-box testing. According to DO178C/RTCA criterion it is mandatory to achieve Level A certification for MC/DC. Concolic testing is the combination of Concrete and Symbolic execution. It is a systematic technique that performs symbolic execution but uses randomlygenerated test inputs to initialize the search and to allow the tool to execute programs when symbolic execution fails. In this paper, we extend con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hybrid Concolic Testing [28,29] extends the CUTE work, where random search and bounded depth-first search are combined. A bounded depth-first search algorithm attempts to explore all neighborhoods of the current paths exhaustively, while a random search algorithm has the ability of reaching deep program branches quickly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid Concolic Testing [28,29] extends the CUTE work, where random search and bounded depth-first search are combined. A bounded depth-first search algorithm attempts to explore all neighborhoods of the current paths exhaustively, while a random search algorithm has the ability of reaching deep program branches quickly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of no. name services classes invocations messages events assignments 1 Quadratic 4 3 6 6 5 3 2 Cramer 7 3 10 9 9 8 3 Geometry 5 4 7 12 8 4 4 Calculator 5 0 5 8 6 6 5 Producer Consumer 4 3 7 8 6 3 6 Healthcare 10 4 13 17 13 11 7 CAssume 4 2 6 6 5 3 8 Bug Godboley et al (2013aGodboley et al ( , 2013bGodboley et al ( , 2015Godboley et al ( ,2016aGodboley et al ( , 2016bGodboley et al ( , 2016cGodboley et al ( , 2016d Proposed approach Black-box testing for SOA HiRSA Ma et al (2008) 4Lubke et al (2009) 5Karimi and Nasser (2009) × 6…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motlagh (2013) 7Yotyawilai and Taratip (2014) 8Kumar and Singh (2015) 9Kumar (2015) 10Nonchot and Taratip (2016) 11 Godboley (2013), Godboley and Mohapatra × (2013) and Godboley et al (2013aGodboley et al ( , 2013bGodboley et al ( , 2015Godboley et al ( , 2016aGodboley et al ( , 2016bGodboley et al ( , 2016cGodboley et al ( , 2016d Proposed approach Kumar (2015) The proposed algorithms give coverage for xml schema (XSD) elements of WSDL. In our proposed approach, we also compute the hit ratio percentage for SOA-based applications.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation