2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-63240-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japanese Political History since the Meiji Renovation 1868–2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sole exception is the formation of the Hiranuma cabinet in January 1939. For a general presentation of the political context and main events of the 1930s, see, for example, Sims, Japanese political history .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sole exception is the formation of the Hiranuma cabinet in January 1939. For a general presentation of the political context and main events of the 1930s, see, for example, Sims, Japanese political history .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Among our principal sources of information are Ellis (1941), Salera (1941), Nurkse (1944), andDiaz-Alejandro (1984). 15 Data for these variables are drawn from Bartolini (2000), Caramani (2000), Paxton (1978, 1998), Daalder (1987), Flora (1983), Hughes and Graham (1968), International IDEA (2002), Jaramillo, Leon-Roesch and Nohlen (1989), Mackie and Rose (1982), Sims (2001), Skidmore and Smith (1992), von Beyme (1970,1985), and Woldendorp et al (1993Woldendorp et al ( , 1998. 16 We exclude the war years (1914-18 and 1940-44) and the transitional years between the Bretton Woods system of pegged but adjustable exchange rates and the post-Bretton Woods float .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first realignment: 1994 Electoral reform To understand how the Japanese party system transitioned from the so-called "1955 system" to the parallel voting system, and how this transition affected the body politic, we have to understand the catalyst for such change. In 1994, under the coalition government, the Diet passed an electoral reform that created a new system -a parallel single-memberdistrict along with proportional representation (SMD-PR), 6 and restricted the rules for electoral funding and spending (Sims 2001). One of the main reasons for the electoral reform was a mistaken consensus, established during the early 1990s, that the Japanese electoral system "was primarily responsible for factionalism, money politics, the power of special interests… [and] an emphasis on personality rather than policy in voting behavior, and LDP one-party dominance" (Curtis 1999, 142).…”
Section: Party Realignments In Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this system, the LDP could maintain a steady majority in both houses of the Diet in spite of its internal divisions. Issues such as clientelism, links to big business and specialized policy-making groups, considered important for such electoral prowess, also facilitated electoral corruption, leading to incidents such as the Recruit and Sagawa cases 3 in the late-1980s and early-1990s (Sims 2001). The revealing of such scandals led to public distrust of the LDP government.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%