2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japanese investors' choice of acquisitions vs. startups in the US: the role of reputation barriers and advertising outlays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, whereas prior studies have argued that acquisitions often come with local brands and market knowledge Delios 1997, 2002;Chen and Zeng 2004;Hennart and Park 1993), we show that the perceived value of these assets, as reflected in the likelihood of acquisition entry, is a function of the perceived need for local marketing adaptation. Furthermore, whereas prior establishment mode studies have explored the direct effects of a prospective subsidiary's relative size, its parent's industry experience, and the host country's development level (Brouthers and Brouthers 2000;Brouthers and Dikova 2010;Chen and Zeng 2004;Hennart and Park 1993;Larimo 2003;Slangen and Hennart 2008), we reveal that these three factors play an important moderating role in the relationship between planned marketing adaptation and mode choices for WOSs. Overall, our findings thus also enrich the understanding of factors that drive MNEs' establishment mode choices.…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, whereas prior studies have argued that acquisitions often come with local brands and market knowledge Delios 1997, 2002;Chen and Zeng 2004;Hennart and Park 1993), we show that the perceived value of these assets, as reflected in the likelihood of acquisition entry, is a function of the perceived need for local marketing adaptation. Furthermore, whereas prior establishment mode studies have explored the direct effects of a prospective subsidiary's relative size, its parent's industry experience, and the host country's development level (Brouthers and Brouthers 2000;Brouthers and Dikova 2010;Chen and Zeng 2004;Hennart and Park 1993;Larimo 2003;Slangen and Hennart 2008), we reveal that these three factors play an important moderating role in the relationship between planned marketing adaptation and mode choices for WOSs. Overall, our findings thus also enrich the understanding of factors that drive MNEs' establishment mode choices.…”
contrasting
confidence: 81%
“…We complement these studies by revealing that MNEs not only attempt to fit their marketing strategy to the external and internal context in which it is implemented but also subsequently fit their mode of foreign establishment to the chosen marketing strategy. Furthermore, we contribute to the small but growing literature stream on the impact of marketing-related factors on foreign expansion decisions (e.g., Chen and Zeng 2004;Mitra and Golder 2002) by showing that marketing adaptation strategy is another factor that affects such decisions.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, partial/majority control acquisitions are motivated by other strategic considerations. Acquirer can procure competitive assets from local firms, such as advanced technologies and well-established brands (Anand & Delios, 2002;Chen & Zeng, 2004). Strategic goals such as rapid entry into growing industries or capacity control in mature industries or consolidation of market power in concentrated sectors can be achieved by partial/ majority control acquisitions (Caves & Mehra, 1986;Hennart & Park, 1993).…”
Section: Stake Of Acquisition and Acquiring Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the strategic alternative (greenfield) where a foreign subsidiary is set up from scratch over a longer period of time, CB M&As allow firms to achieve important strategic goals such as speedy entry into a new geographic market or an industry, consolidation of market power in concentrated global industries, firm transformation, taking advantage of a new opportunity or avoiding a possible future threat (Hennart and Park 1993;Collins et al 2009). Furthermore, through CB M&As firms procure assets from indigenous firms such as advanced technologies, reputable or locally recognized brands and valuable human resources (Anand and Delios 2002;Chen and Zeng 2004). Hence, it does not come as a surprise that the value and the number of CB M&As has been on the rise over the years-the total value of CB M&As in 1990 is registered at $98.90 billion while the value in 2012 is reported to be $308.05 billion (UNCTAD 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%