1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0922-1425(96)00237-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japanese FDI into the U.S. automobile industry: An empirical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we hypothesize that in the period before the VRA the yen strengthens with increased demand for Japanese vehicles. This is opposite of the sign hypothesized by Co (1997) because we are separating this period where the Japanese automobile exporters took an aggressive sales penetration strategy, from the period after the VRA. We use the yen-for-dollar exchange rate as our measure of the relative strength of the two currencies.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we hypothesize that in the period before the VRA the yen strengthens with increased demand for Japanese vehicles. This is opposite of the sign hypothesized by Co (1997) because we are separating this period where the Japanese automobile exporters took an aggressive sales penetration strategy, from the period after the VRA. We use the yen-for-dollar exchange rate as our measure of the relative strength of the two currencies.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In such an environment, a weakening of the yen (a rise in the yen-for-dollar exchange rate), should lead to higher imports of Japanese vehicles. Therefore, in the period after the imposition of the VRA, we expect the positive relationship proposed by Co (1997) between the yen-for-dollar exchange rate and import demand to hold. The alternative form of this hypothesis is:…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the proximity-concentration trade-off hypothesis, FDI and exports are substitutes (Belderbos and Sleuwaegen, 1998;Gopinath et al1999.). In contrast, the spillover effects of multinational corporations on productivity of local firms in the host countries resulting from vertical FDI give rise to the complementarity between FDI and exports (Pfaffermayer, 1994;Brainard, 1997;Co, 1997;Marchant et al, 1999;Clausing, 2000;Jensen, 2002;Wilson, 2006.) In a second line of inquiry, which reflects our second contribution to the literature, we test the presence of third-country effects.…”
Section: Figure 1: Trends In Fdi Outflows: a Regional Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%