2017
DOI: 10.1515/9780824837280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japanese Buddhist Temples in Hawaii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to the BI and ML analyses, we used the program Kakusan4–4.0.2011.05.28 [ 80 ] to select the appropriate models of sequence evolution (Table 3 ). Based on these models, ML analysis was performed using RaxML [ 81 ] and Phylogears2, v2.2.2012.02.13 [ 82 ] software referring to recommended in the manual. For the ML analyses, we assessed nodal support by performing bootstrap analyses with 1000 replications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the BI and ML analyses, we used the program Kakusan4–4.0.2011.05.28 [ 80 ] to select the appropriate models of sequence evolution (Table 3 ). Based on these models, ML analysis was performed using RaxML [ 81 ] and Phylogears2, v2.2.2012.02.13 [ 82 ] software referring to recommended in the manual. For the ML analyses, we assessed nodal support by performing bootstrap analyses with 1000 replications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairwise comparisons of Kimura-2 parameter (K2p) distance (Kimura 1980) were also calculated using MEGA5. ML phylogenies were calculated using TREEFINDER v October 2008 (Jobb et al 2004) with the tool package PHYLOGEARS v 2.0 (Tanabe 2008), and then non-parametric bootstrapping (Felsenstein 1985) was conducted with 500 replicates. The best-fit models for each partition were selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (Akaike 1974) by using KAKUSAN4 (Tanabe 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML phylogenies were calculated using TREEFINDER v October 2008 (Jobb et al 2004) with the tool package PHYLOGEARS v 2.0 (Tanabe 2008), and then non-parametric bootstrapping (Felsenstein 1985) was conducted with 500 replicates. The best-fit models for each partition were selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (Akaike 1974) by using KAKUSAN4 (Tanabe 2011): for 18S, the Jobb 2008 model (J2) with gamma distribution (+G) and proportion of invariant sites (+I) was selected; for the 1st position of histone H3, the Tamura-Nei model (TN93); for the 2nd position of histone H3, the Jukes-Cantor model (JC69); for the 3rd position of histone H3, J2+G; for the 1st position of COI, TN93+G+I; for the 2nd position of COI, the transversion model (TVM)+I; for the 3rd position of COI, the transition model (TIM)+G; and the general time reversal model (GTR)+G was selected for tRNA Cys –16S.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%