2013
DOI: 10.1017/s1876404512001157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japanese Aid in Comparative Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 This observation is still salient, considering that Vietnam and Laos are formally socialist singleparty states, and Cambodia is a de-facto single-party state. 11 As Nicholson and Hinderling (2013) succinctly put it, rule-of-law promotion itself has been the subject of diverse critiques, including: "its ethnocentricity; whether it sufficiently admits context; whether it admits and works with the plurality of legal systems; its colonial roots; its portability and whether it has a positive impact on either economic growth or delivery of democratisation/ human rights" (275). Presumably these criticisms, and other geopolitical and historical considerations such as Japan's own wartime and colonial history, made Japan hesitant to prioritise rule-of-law promotion or even use the term 'rule of law' in the early years of the legal technical assistance projects (Kuong 2018, 274-76).…”
Section: Extending Japan's Reach Through Legal Technical Assistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10 This observation is still salient, considering that Vietnam and Laos are formally socialist singleparty states, and Cambodia is a de-facto single-party state. 11 As Nicholson and Hinderling (2013) succinctly put it, rule-of-law promotion itself has been the subject of diverse critiques, including: "its ethnocentricity; whether it sufficiently admits context; whether it admits and works with the plurality of legal systems; its colonial roots; its portability and whether it has a positive impact on either economic growth or delivery of democratisation/ human rights" (275). Presumably these criticisms, and other geopolitical and historical considerations such as Japan's own wartime and colonial history, made Japan hesitant to prioritise rule-of-law promotion or even use the term 'rule of law' in the early years of the legal technical assistance projects (Kuong 2018, 274-76).…”
Section: Extending Japan's Reach Through Legal Technical Assistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Japan's 2003 ODA Charter, for example, included no mention of 'rule of law', although it features prominently in the 2015 version of the Charter. 12 While experts agree that Japan has progressively engaged in the debate about the place of rule-of-law promotion in aid projects (Taylor 2005;Kuong 2018;Nicholson and Hinderling 2013;Nicholson and Low 2013;Nicholson and Kuong 2014), it is an imprecise instrument for judging the ultimate value of Japan's legal technical assistance projects. 13 To date, a significant number of codes and laws have been established or reformed in host countries through the legal technical assistance projects, with support from JICA and other government bodies.…”
Section: Extending Japan's Reach Through Legal Technical Assistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the Japanese have a long history of engagement with Myanmar, including the provision of various forms of fi nancial assistance through JICA (Steinberg 2001 : 253-258;Seekins 1992 ). Th e Japanese operate outside the Western law and development paradigm (Nicholson and Hinderling 2013 ;Taylor 2005 ). As the primary shareholder in the ADB, and the second largest shareholder in the World Bank aft er the United States, Japan has a signifi cant infl uence through the programmes of these multilateral banks.…”
Section: Foreign Aid Investment and Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%